Something doesn't look too good in the whole thing.
That's why this happen.
"Sir Arthur C. B. E. Wholeflaffers A.S.A." <nospam@newsranger.com> wrote in
message news:iAfeb.22434$cJ5.3169@www.newsranger.com...

Debunking conspiracy theorists

Debunking conspiracy theorists' paranoid fantasies about Sept. 11 One of

the

wilder stories circulating about Sept 11, and one that has attracted

something

of a cult following amongst buffs is that it was carried out by 19

fanatical

Arab hijackers, masterminded by an evil genius named Osama bin Laden, with

no

apparent motivation other than that they "hate our freedoms." Never a

group of

people to be bothered by facts, the perpetrators of this cartoon fantasy

have

constructed an elaborately woven web of delusions and unsubstantiated

hearsay in

order to promote this garbage across the  internet and the media to the

extent

that a number of otherwise rational people have actually fallen under its

spell.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --
THE GREAT 9/11 COINCIDENCE Jon Rappoport

On August 22, 2002, the Associated Press ran a story about 9/11. "Agency

planned

drill for plane crash last Sept. 11."

"...one US intelligence agency [NRO, National Reconnaissance Office] was
planning an exercise last Sept. 11 [2001] in which an errant aircraft

crashed

into one of its buildings."

The same morning. As. The 9/11 attacks.

Accrding to the NRO, their exercise was canceled when the real thing

began.

Barbara Honegger, who worked in the White House under Reagan, points out

another

coincidence. Rsearching press reports, she found a 9/16/01 Washington Post

story

about the pilot of AA flight 77 that, on the morning of 9/11, was said to

have

crashed into the Pentagon.

The pilot, Charles Burlingame, an ex- F4 Navy flyer, had, as his last Navy
mission, helped craft Pentagon response plans in the event of a commercial
airliner hitting the Pentagon.

Pilot drafts plan for response to Pentagon hit. Pilot winds up on plane

that

hits Pentagon.

Honegger states that Dick Cheney was ultimately in charge of the NRO

exercise on

the morning of 9/11. He was in the White House Situation Room for that

purpose.

How do you like all these apples?

The limited hangout on this would be: "The hijackers had found out about

the

upcoming 9/11 mock exercise. They ran their op on top of that, hoping the
confusion between Real and Mock would keep the US government from

responding to

the actual attacks."

Or, one could take this another step: NRO uses many CIA employees. Some

element

of the CIA was involved in the tactics of the actual 9/11 attacks.

All the above coincidences certainly defy the laws of probability.

Since AP eventually ran a story right out in the open about the mock

exercise,

one would think the Hill would have exploded in outrage. A hearing would

have

been held pronto. The "bizarre coincidence" would have become front-page

news

for a week or so.

Didn't happen.

The uncanny ability of the press to suppress---by sheer accident---a story

that

could have taken the lid off Washington---THAT should have become a story

in

itself as well.

Didn't happen.

Where did AP get its story from? It got it from a classic limited hangout,
revealed in an announcement, in 2002, about an upcoming Homeland Security
conference to be held in Chicago. One of the key speakers at the

conference

would be John Fulton, a CIA officer who worked for NRO. The announcement

reads:

"On the morning of September 11, 2001, Mr Fulton and his team...were

running a

pre-planned simulation to explore the emergency response issues that would

be

created if a plane were to strike a building. Little did they know that

the

scenario would come true in a dramatic way that day."

Sure.

NRO/CIA/Cheney/the White House were nervous about this story coming to

light. So

a limited hangout was arranged. The conference brochure would admit to

part of

the truth. Mayor Rudy of NYC was the main speaker at the conference.

Perfect.

As in, "See, we're giving you a fascinating tidbit about 9/11.  Why in the

world

would we do this if there were more to the whole thing? We've got Rudy

himself

on the podium. Don't you think he would go nuts if there were more to

this, if

his city had been devastated as part of some plan in which the federal
govenrment were actually INVOLVED?"

Worked like a charm.

It should be noted that, right after 9/11, the White House denied that the
intelligence community had any clue that a-plane-into-a-building was a

possible

terrorist scenario. When, in fact, a mock exercise for exactly that

eventuality

was in progress on the morning of 9/11.

There is one other possibility here we need to consider. On the morning of

9/11,

THERE WAS NO MOCK EXERCISE UNDERWAY. The whole idea of such an exercise

was

fabricated to explain otherwise mind-boggling communications traffic among
intelligence and military and civilian agencies of the US

government----traffic

that would have exposed the complete and casual disregard for the very

real

events that were underway in the air.

"Oh, all THOSE messages? They were just part of the mock exercise. They

had

nothing to do with the real thing. We were slow to catch on that the

actual

attacks were happening, because we had this practice deal running. What a
coincidence."

When events like 9/11 occur, if you underestimate the devious quality of

the

cover stories, you can miss the true thread.

JON RAPPOPORT www.nomorefakenews.com