Subject: Ed Conrad shamelessly perpetuates his lies (was: Re: PRESIDENT OFFERS REWARD FOR INFO)
From: david.sienkiewicz@attbi.com (David Sienkiewicz)
Date: 02/10/2003, 03:45
Newsgroups: sci.anthropology,alt.fan.cecil.adams,alt.paranet.ufo,alt.christnet

Ed Conrad <edconrad@verizon.net> wrote in message news:<d3nlnvsejv85u53qhasbnbrm4u3ufdrckq@4ax.com>...

< snip >

This hostile, embecilic bot has been passing itself off
as know-it-all, boneheaded, pseudoscientist  Attorney
David Sienkiewicz and has been causing great aggravation
in newsgroups everywhere, including all the ships at sea.

No, Ed, it's only been aggravation for YOU.

That's because frauds hate one thing above all others, and that is to
be exposed as a fraud.

< snip > 

This is the boulder containing the complete human skull. 
Testing has confirmed the presence of Haversian canals
 and American Medical Laboratories discovered it contains
dried blood. 
<
http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Petrified/skullb.jpg

We'll get to the other specimems shortly, Ed - hold your horses.

But let's take a closer look at this one.  This is ALLEGEDLY a skull
embedded in a boulder.

Today, 1 October, 2003, you are still attempting to pass this off as a
legitimate specimen, but the fact is that YOU *KNOW* it isn't.

You took this specimen to a scientist who showed you that the "skull"
was simply an accumulation of clay that was easily removed right
before your eyes.  According to a letter from this scientists that YOU
uncritically posted in this newsgroup as a "rejection letter," you
left his office satisfied that there was no bone in this specimen.

When I pointed this out to you, you attempted to duck the issue. 
Finally, you demanded that I produce the letter, after which you would
be "happy" to provide a rebuttal.

I produced the letter or, rather, your image of it.  

You never issued that rebuttal, Ed. 

Furthermore, I have asked you over and over and over again for a
recent picture of this specimen and you have refused.

Why have you refused, Ed?  Let me answer that for you - you LIED. 

You know there's no bone in this boulder.  

You know you can't produce a recent picture because YOU *KNOW* that
the alleged skull was an accumulation of clay that was washed off
YEARS ago.

If you know that something isn't true; but you attempt to pass it off
as true, that's intent to deceive, Ed.

That's LYING, Ed. 

You're a liar, Ed. 

See:

http://groups.google.com/groups?dq=&hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&safe=off&selm=35fa3772.0309231943.268fa2b5%40posting.google.com

For more specifics. 

Well, Ed?