Subject: Extraterrestrial Genetic Agenda//A Double-Cross?
From: Sir Arthur C.B.E. Wholeflaffers A.S.A.
Date: 01/11/2003, 05:18
Newsgroups: alt.alien.visitors,alt.alien.research,alt.paranet.ufo,alt.paranet.abduct

Genetic Agenda A Double-Cross?

The seminal work of Budd Hopkins first showed recurrent reproductive procedures
performed on abductees aboard UFOs or in alien facilities.  And since the
reports gathered by subsequent researchers confirmed this data, it has become a
"given,"-  a fact of ufology, that the primary purpose of alien contact is to
crossbreed or hybridize a new version of either the aliens themselves or of us.

But is this a solid fact, a safe assumption?  The evidence upon which this
assumption is based is three-fold.  First, reports say that genetic and
reproductive material are being harvested from abductees.  Second, abductees say
the aliens have implanted fetuses into them and then late retrieved the fetuses.
An finally, the reports include scenarios involving the "fetal nursery" and the
presentation of a hybrid-looking baby or child to the abductee, typically with
claims that the baby is the offspring of the abductee.

All of this evidence comes from abduction accounts, remembered both consciously
and under regressive hypnosis.  To date, however, there is no actual hybrid
child in human custody, so the entire "fact" is based solely on encounter
reports.  The accuracy of these reports is questionable, given the nature of the
abduction scenario.  In every encounter, the human's total perceptive intake is
controlled and frequently altered, easily manipulated to give the human a
"created" event to remember and a programmed set of tactile, emotional, and
intellectual responses.  That means that what we abductees think and what we
remember of encounters may not accurately reflect the real events of the
encounter.

Some researchers insist on accepting abduction accounts at face value, however,
but even if we grant the veracity of the reports, there are still problems with
accepting the "fact" of an crossbreeding agenda.  There are other feasible
explanations for the data used to support the hybridization theory that should
be considered.

First, the genetic material harvested from abductees could be intended for some
other use than an upgraded alien species.  For instance, totally human clones,
typically naked and inert or inactive, are reported by abductees.  The genetic
materials could be used in their production.

Another possibility is that, as some abductees report being told or shown, the
small Gray "workers" are mass-produced androidal robots, not soul-bearing
individuals and thus not "alive" as we understand the term.  The Grays show a
strong fetal physiology, as numerous descriptions have stated.  And given enough
mastery of genetics, human reproductive material could be altered so that its
appearance resembled the Gray type, yet be strictly human in composition, rather
than a mixture of alien and human.  The Grays, in effect, could be grossly
altered bodies of human babies, devoid of what we call soul and mentally
programmed like dedicated computer hardware.

Similarly, the reported fetuses could be intended for non-crossbreeding
purposes, notably the same ones just discussed.  Remember, there is no hard
evidence that the fetuses are actually made from any alien-human combination,
only an assumption based on outward appearances and the pronouncements of the
aliens.

The reports of temporary fetal implantations into abductees, by the way, are
reproductively odd, to say the least.  There are some reports of male abductees,
receiving fetal implant, one in the abdomen and another rectally. Both implants,
were later retrieved, just as in the cases of female abductees.  Even
prepubescent children are reported to have received fetal implants.     

There is also evidence that the fetuses, whatever their origin, are not always
treated as if they were precious experiments vital to the survival of either our
race or the aliens.  In a few instances, abductees report watching as aliens
deliberately destroy fetuses in the "fetal nursery" scenario.  In one instance,
the abductee was told that she shouldn't be upset because the fetus was not
really alive, and that all its physical material would be used, not wasted.  In
another instance, the abductee was actually told that the reproductive work and
the fetuses were used in the manufacture of the Gray workers.  She was told that
the aliens were also preparing "workers" for a coming time of destruction,
because they would need workers who were devoid of emotion.

And the "baby presentations" have other possible interpretations, other than the
nurturing of the hybrid offspring, which is what the aliens typically claim.  It
might indeed be an actual event, but the baby could be a strictly human product,
not a crossbreed.  The purpose here might not be for a bonding process, since
many abductees say they don't feel any maternal connection to the baby.  One
woman said she didn't believe the event was for bonding at all but rather was a
tormenting process meant to be emotionally traumatic for the "parent," as part
of some programming agenda.

On the other hand, the presentation might not be real at all.  It could be a
virtual reality scenario.  In such a case, the baby might be something else
altogether, or purely a projected image with no physical reality.  The event
might be designed to give us disinformation, misleading us about the true nature
of their genetics agenda and indeed about the true nature of our relationship
and worth to the aliens.  If the agenda would seem reprehensible to us, it would
certainly serve their purposes to keep us ignorant of it and to give us instead
a more acceptable "cover story."

To muddy the waters even further, the aliens have indicated four contradictory
explanations for the genetics work.  First, they have said it was necessary to
upgrade their declining race.  They have also said that it is necessary to alter
the human species so it can survive some future destruction scenario.  Third,
they have told some abductees that they are here serving God's plan, by
preparing "New Bodies" for the coming Resurrection and return of Christ.  And
finally, they have said they are producing clones of certain individuals, with
which those individuals could be replaced.

Given the alternative possible explanations and the large body of
counterindicative data, as well as the conflicting explanations offered by the
aliens, can we safely accept hybridization as the primary purpose at the heart
of the alien agenda?  Or should we be more skeptical about their avowed
intentions?  

The evidence shows that the aliens do harvest from us in a number of ways,
emotionally and energetically as well as physically.  There are even reported
scenarios of facilities in which human bodies are "processed," and many such
reports come from people unfamiliar with ufological literature.

If we are indeed a multipurpose resource for the aliens, one which they want to
continue to use, could they be performing the various reproductive/genetic
procedures in order to make alterations in their "livestock" that better serve
the uses for which we are harvested?  Such a possibility should not be ruled
out.  There are hypothetical reasons why these alterations might be necessary at
this particular time.

If the aliens know, for example, that upcoming catastrophes or earth changes
will be vastly destructive of their herd, they could be working furiously to
store up supplies in advance of the dearth, and also perhaps trying to produce a
variant human more capable of surviving in some new environment on this planet.
The aliens, in fact, are fond of making predictions of catastrophic earth
changes, although they usually insist their genetic intrusions are altruistic,
for our benefit.

Or what if the aliens realize that their herd is showing changes that the aliens
didn't intent and don't like?  They could be furiously working to stem this
transformative process.  They may fear that the herd is waking up, gaining new
perceptive abilities, and learning that its purpose is nothing more than
livestock.  After all, the herd might be so unhappy with that situation that
they might decide to resist it.  What would be the alien response to such a
situation?  If all the livestock we use on this planet suddenly woke up and
decided they didn't want to "serve Man" any longer, would we all acquiesce
quietly and become vegetarians?

By Karla Turner  From MUFON Journal, #320  Decemeber 1994. Page 13-14.