Subject: Re: BIG BANG really a Big Bang BUST.
From: "Phillip Brown" <phillipbrownau@netscape.net>
Date: 03/11/2003, 02:40
Newsgroups: sci.skeptic,alt.paranet.ufo,alt.atheism,sci.paleontology.mesoamerican

On Fri, 31 Oct 2003 11:45:52 +0000, Ed Conrad wrote:

<
<
The Big Bang, the Scientific Establishment's theory of the birth of the
universe, is nothing more than pseudoscientific nonsense in another of
its vain, arrogant attempts to display its omnscience.

Once again, the pseudoscientists are out in left field regarding a
realistic response to a monumental question, therefore pull a ludicrous
theory out of their hat
<
The fact is, theBig Bang has been reduced to shreds by just one
photograph, that of the "Hubble Deep Field."

 http://www.edconrad.com/images/istherereally.jpg

And you can be sure, the Scientific Establishment very much regrets that
it was ever taken.

For years, the corupt Pseudoscientific Establishment has been jamming
gobs of gibberish down our throat but this one photograph has certainly
set them back on their heels, although it won't admit it.. You see, the
mindboggling photo was  taken long after their facetious theory of the
Big Bang was first proposed -- at a time that no one had any idea of the
unfathomable size and scope of the universe.

The manufacture of such pablum decades ago -- long before the "Deep
Field" photo -- could, indeed, have been accepted, with a grain of salt
as being, well, remotely possible. But certainly not afterward,
especially when it is fact, not fiction, that the scope and size of our
universe is even beyond anyone's wildest imagination .

To know for sure there is a stupendous array of galaxies in ALL
directions, far from what the best conventional telescopes previoulsy
had seen, presents even ANOTHER question that no scientist can answer:
Just how immense  is our universe, and does it ever end?

That a Big Bang could've even been remotely responible for the existence
of our universe is sheer folly, and to promulgate such fiction and
fantasy is pseudoscientism at its best. <
And, be assured, when the Hubble someday likewise focuses on a
teeny-weeny dark patch of sky as shown in the "Hubble Deep Field" photo
-- if the Pseudosscientific Establishment can't prevent it from being
taken - there will be a similiar scene of unfathomable magnificience,
probably more majestic galaxies than are in the original "Deep Field"
photo itself.

Those patheic pseudoscieniss keep forgetting the words of the late,
great Thomas Alva Edison:

"We don't know one-tenth
of one percent about anything."

 Ed Conrad
http://www.edconrad.com
<
Man as Old as Coal


Hubble Deep Field

Hubble's deepest-ever view of the universe unveils myriad galaxies back to
the beginning of time Several hundred never before seen galaxies are
visible in this "deepest-ever" view of the universe, called the Hubble
Deep Field (HDF), made with NASA's Hubble Space Telescope. Besides the
classical spiral and elliptical shaped galaxies, there is a bewildering
variety of other galaxy shapes and colors that are important clues to
understanding the evolution of the universe. Some of the galaxies may have
formed less that one billion years after the Big Bang.

Representing a narrow "keyhole" view all the way to the visible horizon of
the universe, the HDF image covers a speck of sky 1/30th the diameter of
the full Moon (about 25% of the entire HDF is shown here). This is so
narrow, just a few foreground stars in our Milky Way galaxy are visible
and are vastly outnumbered by the menagerie of far more distant galaxies,
some nearly as faint as 30th magnitude, or nearly four billion times
fainter than the limits of human vision. (The relatively bright object
with diffraction spikes just left of center may be a 20th magnitude star.)
Though the field is a very small sample of sky area it is considered
representative of the typical distribution of galaxies in space because
the universe, statistically, looks the same in all directions.

The image was assembled from many separate exposures (342 frames total
were taken, 276 have been fully processed to date and used for this
picture) with the Wide Field and Planetary Camera 2 (WFPC2), for ten
consecutive days between December 18 to 28, 1995. This picture is from one
of three wide-field CCD (Charged Coupled Device) detectors on the WFPC2.

This "true-color" view was assembled from separate images were taken in
blue, red, and infrared light. By combining these separate images into a
single color picture, astronomers will be able to infer -- at least
statistically -- the distance, age, and composition of galaxies in the
field. Bluer objects contain young stars and/or are relatively close,
while redder objects contain older stellar populations and/or farther
away. 

Credit: Robert Williams and the Hubble Deep Field Team (STScI) and
NASA

Image files in GIF and JPEG format and captions may be accessed on
Internet via anonymous ftp from ftp.stsci.edu in /pubinfo.

Higher resolution digital versions (300dpi JPEG) of the release
photographs will be available temporarily in /pubinfo/hrtemp: 96-01a.jpg
and 96-01b.jpg (color) 96-01aBW.jpg and 96-01bBW.jpg (black and white).

PHOTO NO.: STSCI-PRC96-01a
January 15, 1996