Ahhh, isn't that sweet. He's missing me.

On Wed, 05 Nov 2003 06:34:49 GMT, Sir Arthur C.B.E. Wholeflaffers
A.S.A. <nospam@newsranger.com> wrote:

We know from the voluminous amount of research that
some of the LOUDEST debunkers are themselves
alien abductees.  

Pointless to ask, but post some of this research that _you_ have done
(ie not stolen from others).

As some of you who have spent time here,
we know very well that there are many abductees
that are in a HUGE STATE of denial.

No we're not :)

I always thought that Patty Patrick doth
protest a little too much and made very little
sense in his debunking efforts. I flushed
him out early and often.

I'm not surprised that you are befuddled by simple and obvious
statements of fact.

He professed to be knowledgeable about
the Bentwater case, but as usual I knew
way more about it then he did!!

You were unable to post one word that you hadn't stolen from someone
else. You know so little about UFO cases that you can't even give a
simple yes/no to a question about the Berkshire Triangles case. Care
to say whether you think that was a fake or not?

Thought not.

In fact, you've never been able to post one single piece of research
you have done into any UFO case at all. All you have that you haven't
leeched from others, Flaffer, are those silly rants against
'debunkers'. Even then you haven't the imagination to come up with
anything new and simply have to repost the same laughable rubbish over
and over again.

So wherever you are Patty, we will
be looking for you and hopefully
when the ETs are done with you, they
will leave you a better person.  That would
be a much needed improvement. 
And of course you would be taken off
the Truth-Terrorist list if that is the case!!

I wasn't away with the little grey men or the pixies and the fairies
(or whatever you believe in this week). As I've told you before, I
have this thing called a life, and it is generally a lot more
interesting that your endless cycle of thievery and raving.

Come up with a report you wrote into a UFO case. Go on, I dare you.
You haven't even got the wit to rewrite someone elses report so a
simple Google search won't so easily reveal your dishonesty. Your
incompetance is astonishing.


David Patrick