Subject: Re: MIA: Patty Patrick: Victim of Extraterrestrial Visitations?
From: House Widdershins
Date: 09/11/2003, 15:18
Newsgroups: alt.alien.visitors,alt.alien.research,alt.paranet.ufo,alt.paranet.abduct,alt.usenet.kooks

X-No-Archive: Yes. 
On Sat, 08 Nov 2003 20:41:00 GMT, Sir Arthur CBE Wholeflaffers ASA
<nospam@newsranger.com> wrote:

In article <ug1jqv0sv3vj7ogtfk4jum5jk9mglfaabe@4ax.com>, David Patrick says...

Ahhh, isn't that sweet. He's missing me.

WRONG.  We needed a  correct count for Operation
Infinite: Destroy Debunkers (OIDD)!

You wish. Where the hell are my jack-booted thugs, Fluffer? Why
haven't there been any covered duece-and-a-halfs on my street? 
I demand to go to the re-education center, you lying wanker! I
bet you don't/can't deliver. One week, Fluffer. I give you one week
to have me hauled away.


On Wed, 05 Nov 2003 06:34:49 GMT, Sir Arthur C.B.E. Wholeflaffers
A.S.A. <nospam@newsranger.com> wrote:

We know from the voluminous amount of research that
some of the LOUDEST debunkers are themselves
alien abductees.  

Pointless to ask, but post some of this research that _you_ have done
(ie not stolen from others).

Your name is still on the  Truth Terorrist List (TTL).

Evasion noted, kook.


As some of you who have spent time here,
we know very well that there are many abductees
that are in a HUGE STATE of denial.

No we're not :)

Wrong again Patty, this HAS been PROVEN!

You want to show your work? Thought not. Are you off your meds again?
Thought so.



I always thought that Patty Patrick doth
protest a little too much and made very little
sense in his debunking efforts. I flushed
him out early and often.

I'm not surprised that you are befuddled by simple and obvious
statements of fact.

I flushed you out then, and I flushed you out NOW!!

Non-sequitur. You used to be better at this. I think your mind is
slipping. Of course, this pre-supposes something.


He professed to be knowledgeable about
the Bentwater case, but as usual I knew
way more about it then he did!!

You were unable to post one word that you hadn't stolen from someone
else. You know so little about UFO cases that you can't even give a
simple yes/no to a question about the Berkshire Triangles case. Care
to say whether you think that was a fake or not?

Thought not.

Again, my knowledge of Bentwaters exceeds yours by
a factor of a quadrillion.

So, show us.


In fact, you've never been able to post one single piece of research
you have done into any UFO case at all. All you have that you haven't
leeched from others, Flaffer, are those silly rants against
'debunkers'. Even then you haven't the imagination to come up with
anything new and simply have to repost the same laughable rubbish over
and over again.

That "scares" the hell out of you though, doesn't it?
And it should!!

Why? Your regurgitation of tabloid reports doesn't scare anybody. 
They're not designed to. I keep reading your drivel because you're
fun to laugh at. Just like the rest of the kooks in your cell.


So wherever you are Patty, we will
be looking for you and hopefully
when the ETs are done with you, they
will leave you a better person.  That would
be a much needed improvement. 
And of course you would be taken off
the Truth-Terrorist list if that is the case!!

I wasn't away with the little grey men or the pixies and the fairies
(or whatever you believe in this week). As I've told you before, I
have this thing called a life, and it is generally a lot more
interesting that your endless cycle of thievery and raving.

We know what a life of a debunker is: tabloid readingm,
whore-housing, animal husbandry, anal-sex fiends,
paranoid and delusional.  

Your sex fantasies are becoming a bore. Why don't you take a drive
down Sandie boulevard, and avail yourself of one of the entrepreneurs
who frequent the area. Come up with the right amount of cash, and you
can get serviced, and relieve a little of the inner tension you seem
to be having.


Come up with a report you wrote into a UFO case. Go on, I dare you.
You haven't even got the wit to rewrite someone elses report so a
simple Google search won't so easily reveal your dishonesty. Your
incompetance is astonishing.
David Patrick

Now go crawl back to your cave so we can smoke you out!!

Oh, come on, Fluffer. You can do better than that. Throw us a bone, 
here. Post just one little article about some of your research. It 
should be very amusing.




Widdershins

Subject:      Looking for erotic fun in Oregon!!
From:         "Dr. R. X. Frager" <smcqueen@cyberhighway.net>
Date:         1997/02/21
Message-ID:   <330E5597.6E92@cyberhighway.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 209.151.48.166
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Organization: Adzam Communications Enterprises
Mime-Version: 1.0
Reply-To:     smcqueen@cyberhighway.net
Newsgroups:   alt.sex.anal,alt.sex.services,alt.sex.wanted
X-Mailer: Mozilla 1.12(Macintosh; I; 68K)

Slightly eccentric professional man in Pacific Northwest seeks
partner for no-strings-attached arrangement.

Interested in oral, anal (squeezably soft tush a real plus)

Marital status unimportant.

Interest in paranormal phenomena a real plus!!

Dr. R. X. Frager

AKA Artie Holeslapper