On Sat, 08 Nov 2003 20:41:00 GMT, Sir Arthur CBE Wholeflaffers ASA
<nospam@newsranger.com> wrote:

In article <ug1jqv0sv3vj7ogtfk4jum5jk9mglfaabe@4ax.com>, David Patrick says...

Ahhh, isn't that sweet. He's missing me.

WRONG.  We needed a  correct count for Operation
Infinite: Destroy Debunkers (OIDD)!

Where are they then? You keep gibbering 'soon soon', but it never
happens does it? Do you actually believe the bilge you spout or is
this the only way you, wrongly, think you'll get adulation?

On Wed, 05 Nov 2003 06:34:49 GMT, Sir Arthur C.B.E. Wholeflaffers
A.S.A. <nospam@newsranger.com> wrote:

We know from the voluminous amount of research that
some of the LOUDEST debunkers are themselves
alien abductees.  

Pointless to ask, but post some of this research that _you_ have done
(ie not stolen from others).

Your name is still on the  Truth Terorrist List (TTL).

Ooh. Hit a nerve there. No research of your own then?

As some of you who have spent time here,
we know very well that there are many abductees
that are in a HUGE STATE of denial.

No we're not :)

Wrong again Patty, this HAS been PROVEN!

Not by you. You haven't posted one single piece of your own research.
Want to change that now?

No? What a surprise.

I always thought that Patty Patrick doth
protest a little too much and made very little
sense in his debunking efforts. I flushed
him out early and often.

I'm not surprised that you are befuddled by simple and obvious
statements of fact.

I flushed you out then, and I flushed you out NOW!!

See? You just proved my point.

He professed to be knowledgeable about
the Bentwater case, but as usual I knew
way more about it then he did!!

You were unable to post one word that you hadn't stolen from someone
else. You know so little about UFO cases that you can't even give a
simple yes/no to a question about the Berkshire Triangles case. Care
to say whether you think that was a fake or not?

Thought not.

Again, my knowledge of Bentwaters exceeds yours by
a factor of a quadrillion.

You haven't posted one single original post about the Rendlesham
Incident, and you refuse to even acknowledge the Berkshire Triangles
case at all. Why is that? If your knowledge of these cases exceeds
mine then why not post one of your own articles on them?

In fact, you've never been able to post one single piece of research
you have done into any UFO case at all. All you have that you haven't
leeched from others, Flaffer, are those silly rants against
'debunkers'. Even then you haven't the imagination to come up with
anything new and simply have to repost the same laughable rubbish over
and over again.

That "scares" the hell out of you though, doesn't it?
And it should!!

Why would your silly footstamping rants scare anyone?

You desperatly want them to scare someone. It's the laughter you can't
stand, isn't it?

So wherever you are Patty, we will
be looking for you and hopefully
when the ETs are done with you, they
will leave you a better person.  That would
be a much needed improvement. 
And of course you would be taken off
the Truth-Terrorist list if that is the case!!

I wasn't away with the little grey men or the pixies and the fairies
(or whatever you believe in this week). As I've told you before, I
have this thing called a life, and it is generally a lot more
interesting that your endless cycle of thievery and raving.

We know what a life of a debunker is: tabloid readingm,
whore-housing, animal husbandry, anal-sex fiends,
paranoid and delusional.  

And since you're regularly shown to be the biggest debunker here, what
does that say about you?

Come up with a report you wrote into a UFO case. Go on, I dare you.
You haven't even got the wit to rewrite someone elses report so a
simple Google search won't so easily reveal your dishonesty. Your
incompetance is astonishing.
David Patrick

Now go crawl back to your cave so we can smoke you out!!

Post one single piece of research you have written, you coward. Go on,
for just once in your life, put your money where your mouth is.

No? What a surprise.


David Patrick