On Wed, 19 Nov 2003 07:44:08 GMT, Sir Artio <nospam@newsranger.com>
wrote:

In article <enalrv8i9qg2q0emjedr6hak8vjono5id3@4ax.com>, David Patrick says...

On Tue, 18 Nov 2003 23:23:19 GMT, Sir Artio <nospam@newsranger.com>
wrote:

In article <qvlkrvkfv4kaj0lm0vkolskrgj4buvvbpg@4ax.com>, David Patrick says...

On Tue, 18 Nov 2003 14:15:59 GMT, Sir Arthur CBE Wholeflaffers ASA and
VAT <nospam@newsranger.com> wrote:

Let's make this simple for you, Flaffer. Have you ever done any
research yourself into any UFO case?

Yes, you ARE a very simple person.  But no,
the scientific study of the Extraterrestrial presence
requires more than a simple debunker mind.

Well, at least you managed to answer my question, even though I
clearly didn't make it simple enough for you. We all know you're a
debunker and, by your own admission, you're not up to conducting
research.

Patty, let me make this perfectly clear:
Please leave the Usenet and turn over
a complete list of ALL members
of you Cult of Useful Idiots, NOW!!!!

You're not classified for that information. I'll instruct General
Killemall to bring you in for an indoctrination session.

Isn't this typical, another debunker steals my material!!
That's okay Patty, I've heard you haven't been too
well since your most recent "accident."  Perhaps you
need to retire, you are obviously a very delusional
and most likely paranoid, most debunkers are!!

Considering that I was parodying  _your_ behaviour your comments are
simply illuminating you.

At least you know how it feels for honest researchers when you steal
their material to try and make yourself look big.

In a fit of schizophrenia you replied to my post twice, and you
cut-n-pasted two cases for us to discuss. Which one do you want to
concentrate on, the Argentinian Abductions or the Neil Armstrong
story?

Of course, you can still produce any piece of your own UFO research
any time you want.


David Patrick