On Fri, 14 Nov 2003 12:21:19 +0000 (UTC), catshark
<catshark@yahoo.com> wrote:

SNIP

        THE SCIENTIFIC METHOD OF INVESTIGATION
    (When the Truth Would Make Duck Soup of Its Theory)

<
"Strange concretion"
:>> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Petrified/MVC-013F.JPG

"Another rock."

http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Petrified/1tooth.jpg

"Portion of a petrified soup bowl"

http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Smith/z11calv.jpg

<
"Two branches, one petrified"

http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Petrified/z8femur.jpg

"Tree roost"

http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Newpix3/z3dino.jpg

"Petrified balloon, not entirely deflated"

http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Petrified/z5gall.jpg

"Another odd concretion"

http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Day/MVC-005S.JPG>

"Petrified bowling ball embedded in a rock"

http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Petrified/skullb.jpg

"Pair of twigs, covered with coal dust"

http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Au29/MVC-016S.JPG

Or, to answer your question another way, The Scientific Method
of Investigation -- at least in the field of physical anthropology --
is an outright sham that has long championed its self-proclaimed
omniscience, its incredible arrogance and an ample supply
of deceit, deception, collusion and conspiracy.

Let Truth be damned.

Ed Conrad

http://www.edconrad.com

Man as Old as Coal

And I can prove it...

http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Au29/MVC-016S.JPG