| Subject: Putting data BEFORE theory? |
| From: nordskoven@yahoo.com (nordskoven) |
| Date: 26/11/2003, 08:38 |
| Newsgroups: sci.anthropology.paleo,sci.skeptic,alt.paranet.ufo,sci.anthropology |
Conrad's photos and test results represent data, raw data. And no
theory? Where's the future in that? How can Conrad expect to get cushy
grants and theory groupies with no theory? This data can only
undermine the Scientific Industrial Machine Politicos. S.I.M.P.S. must
unite as one in ignoring fossil legbones in shale. Stick with the
cover story having maximum deniability: Pennsylvania Man was only a
weather balloon.