Re: [2 of 5] THE KEY [Commentary]

On Thu, 11 Dec 2003 21:36:27 +0000 (UTC), "Mr. 4X"
<random.dip@jqb.invalid.com> wrote:

no name <oobie@doobie.com> wrote in message 
news:kadetv8j920dgm9mpil31j2auhii2mae6i@4ax.com:

On Mon, 8 Dec 2003 21:18:41 +0000 (UTC), "Mr. 4X"
<random.pjwo@ydex.invalid.com> wrote:

The_Sage <theeSage@azrmci.net> wrote in message
news:jud4tv47g5n6jlnqbvmuo7bdve5jv1nujb@4ax.com:

Reply to article by: harlow@k.st (Harlow)
Date written: 29 Nov 2003 14:57:14 -0800
MsgID:<a4d079c9.0311291457.68139756@posting.google.com>

The Key, Part II 
Copyright � 2003 Unknowncountry.com


Why is it that every New Age charlatan uses quantum physics to
"explain" their beliefs? Is it because they feel safe using a
scientifically valid fact that extremely few people understand to
"explain" using misrepresentation of the actual facts to "support"
their belief?


Either this, or they just want to look more like geniuses by attempting

to

link their BS to something that's too complicated to understand for most
people.


True, and doing just that isn't very intelligent.  What good is

intelligence

if no one can understand you?  Truly intelligent people have to learn to
communicate so everyone can understand -- otherwise their intelligence is
wasted..


I meant that most of these New Age freaks are either nutjobs or frauds, and 
linking such crap to quantum/particle physics (IIRC Dumbass Jerk Min tried 
that a while ago) is probably nothing more than an attempt to look like 
geniuses, not the idiots which they actually are.


I call that techno babble.