Re: Ruppert: Advice for Whistleblowers

 On Wed, 10 Dec 2003 19:17:03 -0800, "Ugly Bob" <ugly_bob42@hotmail.com>
wrote:


"no name" <oobie@doobie.com> wrote in message
news:d7cetvgtar7tja3uaouvrpllstg3djoat6@4ax.com...

On 10 Dec 2003 09:34:31 EST, House Widdershins <sinistre@concentric.net>
wrote:

X-No-Archive: Yes.
On Wed, 10 Dec 2003 05:40:50 GMT, no name <oobie@doobie.com> wrote:

On Tue, 9 Dec 2003 19:27:47 -0800, "Ugly Bob" <ugly_bob42@hotmail.com>
wrote:


"no name" <oobie@doobie.com> wrote in message
news:n1qbtv4360nt1p7t8179ek72t3jf741gif@4ax.com...

On 09 Dec 2003 10:06:07 EST, House Widdershins

<sinistre@concentric.net>

wrote:

X-No-Archive: Yes.
On Tue, 09 Dec 2003 14:59:33 GMT, no name <oobie@doobie.com> wrote:

On Tue, 09 Dec 2003 06:05:14 GMT, Th� Wh�l�fl�ff�r ���ti���m
<nospam@newsranger.com> wrote:

CIA involvement in drugs in Panama


When will George Bush and the CIA realize that all governments on

earth

now

know about what they're doing.  The world money cartel can not buy

alien

technology with their drug money.


There has to be aliens before there can be "alien technology."

HTH


Indeed.  And there are.  And there's an alien saucer at Groom.  And

that's

known by wolrd governments too.  You see Bush and Co. would like

everyone

to

believe there isn't, but there is. Bush wanted to sequester the fact

and

the

technology and keep it for his bosses.  That was a bit short sighted

of

him.


HTH <grin>


No, it doesn't. If, however, you were to come up with something
a little more tangible...


That's your job.


Nope. You made the claim, you get to back it up with hard, physical
unambiguous evidence. Don't have any? That's what I thought.


ROFLMAO  Surely you're not that stupid?  One does not need evidence of
evidence.


How about some tangible evidence that confirms the existence (on
earth) of these aliens of yours? That's not asking too much, is it?


First; let's clarify something, the aliens are not mine.  The aliens do not
belong to me nor does their existence depend on what I or you say or on
human belief structures or on evidence.  

Secondly, I am not the creator of evidence.  The observer does not create
the evidence.  Evidence edists independently of the observer.

Thirdly: In any discussion between two parties, if there isn't a
predetermined agreement on what constitutes evidence (the rules of evidence)
then the discussion is derailed right from the beginning.


                                                     -Ugly Bob

Widdershins

    Science, Logic, and the UFO Debate:
              http://www.primenet.com/~bdzeiler/index.html

Three lies on one line.