Subject: Re: Ruppert: Advice for Whistleblowers
From: House Widdershins
Date: 11/12/2003, 15:36
Newsgroups: alt.alien.visitors,alt.alien.research,alt.paranet.ufo,alt.paranet.abduct,alt.usenet.kooks

X-No-Archive: Yes. 
On Thu, 11 Dec 2003 14:40:31 GMT, no name <oobie@doobie.com> wrote:

snip
Indeed.  And there are.  And there's an alien saucer at Groom.  And
that's
known by wolrd governments too.  

snip

No, it doesn't. If, however, you were to come up with something
a little more tangible...

That's your job.

Nope. You made the claim, you get to back it up with hard, physical
unambiguous evidence. Don't have any? That's what I thought.

ROFLMAO  Surely you're not that stupid?  One does not need evidence of
evidence.

How about some tangible evidence that confirms the existence (on
earth) of these aliens of yours? That's not asking too much, is it?

First; let's clarify something, the aliens are not mine.  The aliens do not
belong to me nor does their existence depend on what I or you say or on
human belief structures or on evidence.  

Secondly, I am not the creator of evidence.  The observer does not create
the evidence.  Evidence edists independently of the observer.

Thirdly: In any discussion between two parties, if there isn't a
predetermined agreement on what constitutes evidence (the rules of evidence)
then the discussion is derailed right from the beginning.

Typical evasion noted. Word games don't get you out of this one.
You made the claim for a "saucer at Groom (see above)," not
for *evidence* (emphasis added) of a saucer.

Stop playing games. Provide the evidence for the "Saucer,"
or retract the claim.



Widdershins

Stupidity is not a crime, so you're free to go.