| Subject: Re: Ruppert: Advice for Whistleblowers |
| From: no name |
| Date: 11/12/2003, 18:50 |
| Newsgroups: alt.alien.visitors,alt.alien.research,alt.paranet.ufo,alt.paranet.abduct,alt.usenet.kooks |
On 11 Dec 2003 10:28:20 EST, House Widdershins <sinistre@concentric.net>
wrote:
X-No-Archive: Yes.
On Wed, 10 Dec 2003 14:45:49 GMT, no name <oobie@doobie.com> wrote:
On 10 Dec 2003 09:34:31 EST, House Widdershins <sinistre@concentric.net>
wrote:
X-No-Archive: Yes.
On Wed, 10 Dec 2003 05:40:50 GMT, no name <oobie@doobie.com> wrote:
On Tue, 9 Dec 2003 19:27:47 -0800, "Ugly Bob" <ugly_bob42@hotmail.com>
wrote:
"no name" <oobie@doobie.com> wrote in message
news:n1qbtv4360nt1p7t8179ek72t3jf741gif@4ax.com...
On 09 Dec 2003 10:06:07 EST, House Widdershins <sinistre@concentric.net>
wrote:
X-No-Archive: Yes.
On Tue, 09 Dec 2003 14:59:33 GMT, no name <oobie@doobie.com> wrote:
On Tue, 09 Dec 2003 06:05:14 GMT, Thé Whøléflåffér ÇøñtiñÜÜm
<nospam@newsranger.com> wrote:
CIA involvement in drugs in Panama
When will George Bush and the CIA realize that all governments on earth
now
know about what they're doing. The world money cartel can not buy alien
technology with their drug money.
There has to be aliens before there can be "alien technology."
HTH
Indeed. And there are. And there's an alien saucer at Groom. And that's
known by wolrd governments too. You see Bush and Co. would like everyone
to
believe there isn't, but there is. Bush wanted to sequester the fact and
the
technology and keep it for his bosses. That was a bit short sighted of
him.
HTH <grin>
No, it doesn't. If, however, you were to come up with something
a little more tangible...
That's your job.
Nope. You made the claim, you get to back it up with hard, physical
unambiguous evidence. Don't have any? That's what I thought.
ROFLMAO Surely you're not that stupid? One does not need evidence of
evidence.
Did you forget about the claim you made for there being a saucer at
Groom Lake? That, fool, is a claim. It's your duty to provide evidence
for it, or retract it.
Go ahead. I'll just wait over here.
I'm definitely not retracting what I said because it's true. You can regard
it as a claim or a clam or linguine. But it's a fact, not a claim. You can
verify it for yourself if you have the clearance to go to Groom and see it
for yourself. I don't have to prove anything to anyone.
Widdershins
Science, Logic, and the UFO Debate:
http://www.primenet.com/~bdzeiler/index.html
Three lies on one line.