Re: Ruppert: Advice for Whistleblowers
Subject: Re: Ruppert: Advice for Whistleblowers
From: no name
Date: 12/12/2003, 06:30
Newsgroups: alt.alien.visitors,alt.alien.research,alt.paranet.ufo,alt.paranet.abduct,alt.usenet.kooks

On Thu, 11 Dec 2003 23:58:17 GMT, KittyKat <nospam@nospam.com> wrote:

Ok. Supposing that you are telling the truth.

I am.

In effect despite what you say the secret is perfectly safe.

It has not been a secret ever.  The secret was never safe.

No one would believe you. 

Sure they believe it, most do. Even the polls prove that.

No one can 
actually go and see for themselves. 

They could, it woudl require revolunary tactics, but they could.

No threat to the secret.

You mean no threat to the mind control and belief manipulation of the
reality of the secret.  That is ALL the government has.  They can not change
reality, only the perception of reality.  That is mind control and  it is
practiced every day in these newsgroups as well as on the media.  

But given that there really is an alien spaceship, and the government is 
somehow selling out to gain the knowledge from the aliens...

That's true.

what is the cost to the rest of humanity. 

Enormous costs -  world domination in order to keep the secret.  People
killed and their lives ruined.  Countries annihilated, world drug addition,
and so on and so forth.  The alien saucer and how it's beenhandled has been
the singular worst thing to happen to humanity.  AND it's NOT improving, to
the contrary it now reached a point where even the aliens have backed off
from human kind.  IMO, they're observing the destruction of our species, and
in fact I'm quite positive.

What do the aliens hope to gain from it??? 

They gain nothing except knowledge of an animlaistic species.

And once both sides get what they want and neither is of any use which 
one would eliminate the other???? Would YOU or anyone trust either 
group???Not even aliens are that benevolent or naive that they do not 
have some hidden agenda. Beware of strangers bearing gifts.

I'd rather be with aliens than humans.  To date aliens have been much kinder
and caring than human beings have been to me.


no name wrote:
On 11 Dec 2003 10:28:20 EST, House Widdershins <sinistre@concentric.net>
wrote:


X-No-Archive: Yes. 
On Wed, 10 Dec 2003 14:45:49 GMT, no name <oobie@doobie.com> wrote:


On 10 Dec 2003 09:34:31 EST, House Widdershins <sinistre@concentric.net>
wrote:


X-No-Archive: Yes. 
On Wed, 10 Dec 2003 05:40:50 GMT, no name <oobie@doobie.com> wrote:


On Tue, 9 Dec 2003 19:27:47 -0800, "Ugly Bob" <ugly_bob42@hotmail.com>
wrote:


"no name" <oobie@doobie.com> wrote in message
news:n1qbtv4360nt1p7t8179ek72t3jf741gif@4ax.com...

On 09 Dec 2003 10:06:07 EST, House Widdershins <sinistre@concentric.net>
wrote:


X-No-Archive: Yes.
On Tue, 09 Dec 2003 14:59:33 GMT, no name <oobie@doobie.com> wrote:


On Tue, 09 Dec 2003 06:05:14 GMT, Thé Whøléflåffér ÇøñtiñÜÜm
<nospam@newsranger.com> wrote:


CIA involvement in drugs in Panama

When will George Bush and the CIA realize that all governments on earth

now

know about what they're doing.  The world money cartel can not buy alien
technology with their drug money.

There has to be aliens before there can be "alien technology."

HTH

Indeed.  And there are.  And there's an alien saucer at Groom.  And that's
known by wolrd governments too.  You see Bush and Co. would like everyone

to

believe there isn't, but there is. Bush wanted to sequester the fact and

the

technology and keep it for his bosses.  That was a bit short sighted of

him.

HTH <grin>

No, it doesn't. If, however, you were to come up with something
a little more tangible...

That's your job. 

Nope. You made the claim, you get to back it up with hard, physical
unambiguous evidence. Don't have any? That's what I thought.

ROFLMAO  Surely you're not that stupid?  One does not need evidence of
evidence.


Did you forget about the claim you made for there being a saucer at
Groom Lake? That, fool, is a claim. It's your duty to provide evidence
for it, or retract it.

Go ahead. I'll just wait over here.


I'm definitely not retracting what I said because it's true.  You can regard
it as a claim or a clam or linguine. But it's a fact, not a claim.  You can
verify it for yourself if you have the clearance to go to Groom and see it
for yourself.   I don't have to prove anything to anyone.



Widdershins

   Science, Logic, and the UFO Debate:
             http://www.primenet.com/~bdzeiler/index.html

Three lies on one line.