Subject: Re: Ruppert: Advice for Whistleblowers
From: KittyKat
Date: 12/12/2003, 19:11
Newsgroups: alt.alien.visitors,alt.alien.research,alt.paranet.ufo,alt.paranet.abduct

Thats crap and you know it. IF and a big IF at that...they actually left a ship (loaded gun)it is useless if we can't even USE it. You said your self it has to be 'reverse engineered' and we can't DO that etc. So....your explanations are full of holes (as other parts of your anatomy)We are not all fools to swallow all this crap without question.
Did you DREAM all this stuff...or were you inhaling something illegal????

no name wrote:
On Fri, 12 Dec 2003 07:22:39 GMT, KittyKat <nospam@nospam.com> wrote:


Why did the aliens park their saucer on the runway anyways. What motive or purpose. Surely they have had plenty of time to study us as a species. Its like giving a gun to a child and blaming the child if he gets hurt. Makes no sense except that their motive is to destroy us if everything is true as you say.


They didn't destory us, we destroyed ourselves.  Giving us the saucer was
the equivalent of giving an insane person a loaded gun.

no name wrote:

On Fri, 12 Dec 2003 04:49:11 GMT, KittyKat <nospam@nospam.com> wrote:



Gee now THAT is really dissapointing. I used to believe in Santa but someone told me he wasn't real either.  :(



Snta didn't park his sled on the runway at Holloman AFB and leave it for the
government to deal with like the aliens did with their saucer in 1973.


Pete Charest wrote:



On Thu, 11 Dec 2003 21:48:47 GMT, KittyKat <nospam@nospam.com> wrote:


Sorry to disappoint you, Kit, but there aren't any aliens.


---
Pete Charest
KookSpotter
If you're not insulted, you're not a kook.