"no name" <oobie@doobie.com> wrote in message
news:75kitv0vru9btsf1fihr7bklbo0gde57ag@4ax.com...

On Thu, 11 Dec 2003 19:30:14 -0800, "Ugly Bob" <ugly_bob42@hotmail.com>
wrote:

"no name" <oobie@doobie.com> wrote in message
news:q3fhtvg0he3kfikhul4jsuj7fj7fsukg46@4ax.com...

On 11 Dec 2003 10:36:33 EST, House Widdershins

<sinistre@concentric.net>

wrote:

X-No-Archive: Yes.
On Thu, 11 Dec 2003 14:40:31 GMT, no name <oobie@doobie.com> wrote:

snip

Indeed.  And there are.  And there's an alien saucer at

Groom.

And

that's

known by wolrd governments too.

snip

No, it doesn't. If, however, you were to come up with

something

a little more tangible...

That's your job.

Nope. You made the claim, you get to back it up with hard,

physical

unambiguous evidence. Don't have any? That's what I thought.

ROFLMAO  Surely you're not that stupid?  One does not need

evidence

of

evidence.

How about some tangible evidence that confirms the existence (on
earth) of these aliens of yours? That's not asking too much, is it?

First; let's clarify something, the aliens are not mine.  The aliens

do

not

belong to me nor does their existence depend on what I or you say or

on

human belief structures or on evidence.

Secondly, I am not the creator of evidence.  The observer does not

create

the evidence.  Evidence edists independently of the observer.

Thirdly: In any discussion between two parties, if there isn't a
predetermined agreement on what constitutes evidence (the rules of

evidence)

then the discussion is derailed right from the beginning.

Typical evasion noted. Word games don't get you out of this one.
You made the claim for a "saucer at Groom (see above)," not
for *evidence* (emphasis added) of a saucer.

Stop playing games. Provide the evidence for the "Saucer,"
or retract the claim.

It's not a claim, but a fact that can be verified.

So, varify it. That's all we want.

Varify?

 I meant 'verify' (poor spelling on my part).

 Is that in the dictionary?

 Well, yes.

http://www.bennetyee.org/http_webster.cgi?varify&method=exact

 But that's neither here nor there.

 Who is 'we'?

 TINW. My mistake (again).

 And why do you wnt it?

 I don't wnt anything ;-)

 I don't need to provide
evidence of a fact.  Or evidence of aliens visiting this planet.  The
evidence exists at Groom Lake.  Your belief system has no bearing on

the

fact.

 This has nothing to do with any belief system. All we want is
cold, hard facts. Either you can provide some or you can't. It's
as simple as that.

I did. Facts don't need to be proven.

 No one's asking for facts to be proven, merely confirmation of your
assertions of underground alien flying saucers at a certain base within
the Nellis test range.

IE http://home.earthlink.net/~quade/jpg/r4808n.jpg

Widdershins

Stupidity is not a crime, so you're free to go.