Re: Ruppert: Advice for Whistleblowers

The notorious net kook and mental patient known as pRick Boston put on his "Otis Reed" sock and wrote:

On 10 Dec 2003 09:34:31 EST, House Widdershins
<sinistre@concentric.net> wrote:

X-No-Archive: Yes. On Wed, 10 Dec 2003 05:40:50 GMT, no name <oobie@doobie.com> wrote:

On Tue, 9 Dec 2003 19:27:47 -0800, "Ugly Bob" <ugly_bob42@hotmail.com>
wrote:

"no name" <oobie@doobie.com> wrote in message
news:n1qbtv4360nt1p7t8179ek72t3jf741gif@4ax.com...

On 09 Dec 2003 10:06:07 EST, House Widdershins <sinistre@concentric.net>
wrote:

X-No-Archive: Yes.
On Tue, 09 Dec 2003 14:59:33 GMT, no name <oobie@doobie.com> wrote:

On Tue, 09 Dec 2003 06:05:14 GMT, Th� Wh�l�fl�ff�r ��ti��m
<nospam@newsranger.com> wrote:

CIA involvement in drugs in Panama

When will George Bush and the CIA realize that all governments on earth

now

know about what they're doing. The world money cartel can not buy alien
technology with their drug money.

There has to be aliens before there can be "alien technology."

HTH

Indeed. And there are. And there's an alien saucer at Groom. And that's
known by wolrd governments too. You see Bush and Co. would like everyone

to

believe there isn't, but there is. Bush wanted to sequester the fact and

the

technology and keep it for his bosses. That was a bit short sighted of

him.

HTH <grin>

No, it doesn't. If, however, you were to come up with something
a little more tangible...

That's your job.

Nope. You made the claim, you get to back it up with hard, physical
unambiguous evidence. Don't have any? That's what I thought.

What a ludicrous demand.

What a typical whine from a saucer head. Anything real can be supported with evidence. Only the unreal fails this test.

This is an electronic medium, usenet.

The medium is irrelevant. If evidence exists then the claimant ought to be able to relate it, or at the very least point to where it may be found. Science has no trouble doing this through electronic and even written media. Why is it that saucer heads can't seem to do it?

It is friggin' impossible to provide 'hard physical evidence' over an
electronic medium.

Wrong. See above.

I see debunker types make that demand many times,

And I have yet to see a single saucer head produce anything tangible.

and laugh
at your ridiculous assumption that anyone could supply 'hard physical
evidence' of anything over an electronic medium.

Simply repeating the same stupidity over and over again won't make it true, pRick.

Go you one better, 'If' I had an alien spacecraft in my backyard, and
a dead alien in my freezer, it would be impossible to comply to your
demand.

> There is no way, even 'if' I had these two things in my
> possession, that I could supply 'hard physical evidence' over
> usenet. HTH.s

Wrong again. You could give us your address and invite us over to see it. You could post the results of metallurgical tests and biological tests. There's any number of ways you could provide evidence, if you had something real, and you weren't just a clueless kook.

If there really is a dead body in your freezer though (and that wouldn't surprise me a bit) it's probably just your poor brother.

--
The Evil Michael Davis(tm)
http://www.mdpub.com/scopeworks/
http://skepticult.org Member #264-70198-536
Member #33 1/3 of The "I Have Been Killfiled By Tommy" Club

"There's a sucker born every minute" - David Hannum (often erroneously attributed to P. T. Barnum)