| Subject: Re: Ruppert: Advice for Whistleblowers |
| From: Bob Officer |
| Date: 14/12/2003, 19:40 |
| Newsgroups: alt.alien.visitors,alt.alien.research,alt.paranet.ufo,alt.paranet.abduct,alt.usenet.kooks |
On Fri, 12 Dec 2003 15:33:47 GMT, in alt.usenet.kooks, no name
<oobie@doobie.com> wrote:
On Fri, 12 Dec 2003 13:21:58 GMT, Wally Anglesea™
<wanglese@spammersbigpondareparasites.net.au> wrote:
On Fri, 12 Dec 2003 13:15:21 GMT, no name <oobie@doobie.com> wrote:
On Fri, 12 Dec 2003 06:58:31 GMT, Wally Anglesea™
<wanglese@spammersbigpondareparasites.net.au> wrote:
On Fri, 12 Dec 2003 05:30:44 GMT, no name <oobie@doobie.com> wrote:
On Fri, 12 Dec 2003 02:40:20 GMT, Wally Anglesea™ <wanglese@bigpond.net.au>
wrote:
On Fri, 12 Dec 2003 02:12:56 GMT, no name <oobie@doobie.com> wrote:
I see you have set aside this special time to demonstrate your
kookiness. Well done,.
On Fri, 12 Dec 2003 01:57:21 GMT, Wally Anglesea™ <wanglese@bigpond.net.au>
wrote:
On Thu, 11 Dec 2003 21:05:25 GMT, no name <oobie@doobie.com> wrote:
On Thu, 11 Dec 2003 20:34:01 GMT, Michael Davis <mdavis19@ix.netcom.com>
wrote:
<snip>
Evidence is tangible, testable, repeatable and unambiguous. <snip>
The alien saucer underground at Groom Lake satisfies all those criteria.
Prove there is one.
Can't?
then STFU
I don't have to prove there is a saucer at Groom because there IS one there,
and it's alien. And government insiders are quite aware of it. As I am.
I love the way your mental gymnastics work. I note with glee that you
refuse to backup your own fantasy.
Because it's not a fantasy.
Care to PROVE it?
I don't have to prove anything to you.
Well, you have proven you are a nutjob with a loose grip on reality.
No I've proven I have something to say other than name calling, Name
calling is the hallmark of a loser.
Except this time the label is correctly applied. Then it isn't name
calling.