The notorious net kook and mental patient known as pRick Boston
put on his "Otis Reed" sock and wrote:

On Sat, 13 Dec 2003 16:08:47 GMT, Michael Davis
<mdavis19@ix.netcom.com> wrote:

The notorious net kook and mental patient known as pRick Boston put on his "Otis Reed" sock and wrote:

On 10 Dec 2003 09:34:31 EST, House Widdershins
<sinistre@concentric.net> wrote:

<snip>

Nope. You made the claim, you get to back it up with hard, physical
unambiguous evidence. Don't have any? That's what I thought.

What a ludicrous demand.

What a typical whine from a saucer head. Anything real can be supported with evidence. Only the unreal fails this test.

Dumbo, you cannot transmit 'hard physical evidence'over usenet.
It is impossible. period.

That's not what anyone is asking you to do, kook. It's just a straw man argument, and it's wrong anyway. Evidence can be transmitted over any medium. Information can be evidence, and information can be transmitted over any medium. At the very least, you ought to be able to tell us where to find evidence to back up your claims over *any* available medium. Your utter failure to do this marks you as a kook and possibly a fraud.

This is an electronic medium, usenet.

The medium is irrelevant.

Very relevant, you cannot provide 'hard physical evidence'
over an electronic medium.

See above, Shantar.

If evidence exists then the claimant ought to be able to relate it, or at the very least point to where it may be found.

Relate all you like, you would just say he is lying.

Only if attempts to verify his claims prove him to be a liar.

Point to all the documents you what, you would just claim that they are frauds and hoaxes.

Only if they really are frauds and hoaxes, which to date, all have been.

Science has no trouble doing this through electronic and even written media.

That is because their standard for acceptance of evidence
is not some impossible to reach demand.

Yes, they just demand reality. Funny how that is too restrictive for you saucer heads.

Give 'one' example of scientists transmitting 'hard physical evidence' over usenet.

Go read a moderated science NG.

Why is it that saucer heads can't seem to do it?

That is because your goalpost is impossible to reach.

Yes, actual evidence that supports your fantasies does seem to be an impossible to reach goal for you saucer heads. Sucks to be you.

It is friggin' impossible to provide 'hard physical evidence' over an
electronic medium.

Wrong. See above.

You are the one mistaken. If you don't believe it, try it. You can't
because it is impossible..

Ok, watch me prove you are insane.

http://groups.google.com/groups?safe=images&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&as_uauthors=rick%20boston&lr=&hl=en

There you go. You may consider yourself debunked, kook.

I see debunker types make that demand many times,

And I have yet to see a single saucer head produce anything tangible.

and laugh
at your ridiculous assumption that anyone could supply 'hard physical
evidence' of anything over an electronic medium.

Simply repeating the same stupidity over and over again won't make it true, pRick.

Like you repeating the same stupidity over and over again, that I am
pRick won't make it true.

No, it's the fact that you *are* pRick that makes it true. HTH.

Go you one better, 'If' I had an alien spacecraft in my backyard, and
a dead alien in my freezer, it would be impossible to comply to your
demand.
There is no way, even 'if' I had these two things in my
possession, that I could supply 'hard physical evidence' over
usenet. HTH.s

Wrong again. You could give us your address and invite us over to see it. You could post the results of metallurgical tests and biological tests.

You have to be nuts to think for one moment I would welcome
a psychopath such as yourself into my house.

Do you have a "one psychopath in the house at a time" rule then, pRick?

If I did post the results from any tests , you would just claim
they were fabricated.

Only if they really were fabricated and the authenticity could not be confirmed. Most testing labs are well acquainted with the need for maintaining the "chain of evidence" and with providing certification of their results. It happens every day in the medical and law enforcement arenas. So if you were to post results that could be verified, You'd actually have something. Funny how no saucer head has ever managed such a thing. Guess you clowns are all just full of shit, eh?

--
The Evil Michael Davis(tm)
http://www.mdpub.com/scopeworks/
http://skepticult.org Member #264-70198-536
Member #33 1/3 of The "I Have Been Killfiled By Tommy" Club

"There's a sucker born every minute" - David Hannum (often erroneously attributed to P. T. Barnum)