| Subject: Re: Ruppert: Advice for Whistleblowers |
| From: Otis Reed |
| Date: 15/12/2003, 05:08 |
| Newsgroups: alt.alien.visitors,alt.alien.research,alt.paranet.ufo,alt.paranet.abduct |
On Sun, 14 Dec 2003 21:25:31 GMT, Michael Davis
<mdavis19@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
<snip>
Dumbo, you cannot transmit c
It is impossible. period.
That's not what anyone is asking you to do, kook. It's just a
straw man argument, and it's wrong anyway. Evidence can be
transmitted over any medium.
Dumbo, the argument was not whether 'evidence' can be transmitted,
but 'hard,physical evidence'
Information can be evidence, and
information can be transmitted over any medium.
That is not in debate, 'HARD.PHYSICAL evidence cannot
be transmitted over usenet, Dumbo.
At the very least,
you ought to be able to tell us where to find evidence to back up
your claims over *any* available medium.
I did not make any claim you dunderhead. Other than it being
impossible to transmit 'hard physical evidence'over usenet.
It is impossible regardless of how much you deny it.
Your utter failure to do
this marks you as a kook and possibly a fraud.
Your jumping the gun to label me makes you a kook, I had no evidence
nor did I make any claim that I did, I just pointed out how absurd HW
demand for 'hard physical evidence'over usenet is.
You are such an idiot.