Subject: Re: Ruppert: Advice for Whistleblowers
From: Wally Anglesea&#65533; <wanglese@spammersbigpondareparasites.net.au>
Date: 15/12/2003, 08:04
Newsgroups: alt.alien.visitors,alt.alien.research,alt.paranet.ufo,alt.paranet.abduct

On Mon, 15 Dec 2003 05:08:17 GMT, Otis Reed <oreed@dontbother.net>
wrote:

On Sun, 14 Dec 2003 21:25:31 GMT, Michael Davis
<mdavis19@ix.netcom.com> wrote:

<snip>

Dumbo, you cannot transmit c
It is impossible. period.

That's not what anyone is asking you to do, kook. It's just a 
straw man argument, and it's wrong anyway. Evidence can be 
transmitted over any medium.

Dumbo, the argument was not whether 'evidence' can be transmitted,
but 'hard,physical evidence'


Information can be evidence, and 
information can be transmitted over any medium. 

That is not in debate, 'HARD.PHYSICAL evidence cannot
be transmitted over usenet, Dumbo.

Nobody asked for hard evidence to be transmitted over usenet, moron.

At the very least, 
you ought to be able to tell us where to find evidence to back up 
your claims over *any* available medium. 

I did not make any claim you dunderhead. Other than it being
impossible to transmit 'hard physical evidence'over usenet.
It is impossible regardless of how much you deny it.


Your utter failure to do 
this marks you as a kook and possibly a fraud.

Your jumping the gun to label me makes you a kook, 
Why pussy foot around, Otis, calling a spade a spade saves time. 

BTW, if it walks like a duck, and quacks like a duck, then it's
probably a duck. You're a duck, Otis.



-- http://users.bigpond.net.au/wanglese/Alien_recipes.html "You can't fool me, it's turtles all the way down."