Re: Ruppert: Advice for Whistleblowers

On Sun, 14 Dec 2003 11:40:06 -0800, Bob Officer
<bobofficers.I-hate-Swen@earthlink.net> wrote:

On Fri, 12 Dec 2003 15:33:47 GMT, in alt.usenet.kooks, no name
<oobie@doobie.com> wrote:

On Fri, 12 Dec 2003 13:21:58 GMT, Wally Anglesea�
<wanglese@spammersbigpondareparasites.net.au> wrote:

On Fri, 12 Dec 2003 13:15:21 GMT, no name <oobie@doobie.com> wrote:

On Fri, 12 Dec 2003 06:58:31 GMT, Wally Anglesea�
<wanglese@spammersbigpondareparasites.net.au> wrote:

On Fri, 12 Dec 2003 05:30:44 GMT, no name <oobie@doobie.com> wrote:

On Fri, 12 Dec 2003 02:40:20 GMT, Wally Anglesea� <wanglese@bigpond.net.au>
wrote:

On Fri, 12 Dec 2003 02:12:56 GMT, no name <oobie@doobie.com> wrote:

I see you have set aside this special time to demonstrate your
kookiness. Well done,.

On Fri, 12 Dec 2003 01:57:21 GMT, Wally Anglesea� <wanglese@bigpond.net.au>
wrote:

On Thu, 11 Dec 2003 21:05:25 GMT, no name <oobie@doobie.com> wrote:

On Thu, 11 Dec 2003 20:34:01 GMT, Michael Davis <mdavis19@ix.netcom.com>
wrote:

<snip>

Evidence is tangible, testable, repeatable and unambiguous. <snip>


The alien saucer underground at Groom Lake satisfies all those criteria.


Prove there is one.
Can't?

then STFU


I don't have to prove there is a saucer at Groom because there IS one there,
and it's alien.  And government insiders are quite aware of it.  As I am.


I love the way your mental gymnastics work. I note with glee that you
refuse to backup your own fantasy.


Because it's not a fantasy.


Care to PROVE it?


I don't have to prove anything to you.



Well, you have proven you are a nutjob with a loose grip on reality.


No I've proven I have something to say other than name calling,  Name
calling is the hallmark of a loser.


Except this time the label is correctly applied. Then it isn't name
calling.


Yeah it's name calling.  And a sure sign you've lost the argument.  Youhave
to prove me wrong.