| Subject: Re: Ruppert: Advice for Whistleblowers |
| From: "Dick Hertz (Hey, who's Dick Hertz?)" <me@example.com> |
| Date: 16/12/2003, 02:46 |
| Newsgroups: alt.alien.visitors,alt.alien.research,alt.paranet.ufo,alt.paranet.abduct,alt.usenet.kooks |
x-no-archive: yes
"no name" has a brand new box of crayons:
On 12 Dec 2003 20:55:48 EST, House Widdershins <sinistre@concentric.net>
wrote:
On Thu, 11 Dec 2003 14:40:31 GMT, no name <oobie@doobie.com> wrote:
And there's an alien saucer at Groom.
And that's known by world governments too.
It's not a claim, but a fact that can be verified.
So, varify it. That's all we want.
Varify? Is that in the dictionary? Who is 'we'? And why do you want it?
Further evasion noted.
No evasion what so ever. I'm not asking you to believe anything, I am
simply stating a fact which is true and verifiable. There is an alien
That's not how it works. It's YOUR claim. YOU verify it.
saucer at Groom Lake. Beliefs cannot alter reality. Reality doesn't give a
Prove it.
f*ck what you believe or say. Not to mention asking for verification from
me is a logical fallacy. What I said is true. I know it's true, and so
Really? I'm an elf. Asking for verification of this claim is a
logical fallacy.
does most of the intelligence community. Because someone does not have
I know that I'm an elf, and so does most of the intelligence community.
So there.
access to Groom Lake or has no knowledge means just that -- they're ignorant
of the facts.
<snip bs>