| Subject: Re: Ruppert: Advice for Whistleblowers |
| From: Wally Anglesea� <wanglese@spammersbigpondareparasites.net.au> |
| Date: 16/12/2003, 06:02 |
| Newsgroups: alt.alien.visitors,alt.alien.research,alt.paranet.ufo,alt.paranet.abduct,alt.usenet.kooks |
On Tue, 16 Dec 2003 01:38:00 GMT, no name <oobie@doobie.com> wrote:
On Sun, 14 Dec 2003 20:26:55 GMT, Wally Anglesea™
<wanglese@spammersbigpondareparasites.net.au> wrote:
On Sun, 14 Dec 2003 11:40:06 -0800, Bob Officer
<bobofficers.I-hate-Swen@earthlink.net> wrote:
<SNIP>
Well, you have proven you are a nutjob with a loose grip on reality.
No I've proven I have something to say other than name calling, Name
calling is the hallmark of a loser.
Except this time the label is correctly applied. Then it isn't name
calling.
Indeed. I've always believed there's no reason to pussy-foot around
the question. Call a spade a spade. It saves time.
It may save you time, but any stupid person knows name calling is not only a
second grade tactic, but an unethical one as well.
Nope, Like I said, it saves time. ON the *EVIDENCE* so far (your
posts), you are both a kook, and a liar. HTH
The burden of proof stands on you to prove me wrong, and you can't because
what I said is quite true:
There's an alien saucer underground at Groom Lake.
Prove it. Don't make unsubstantiated claims. Liars do that.
HTH, Kook.
It's an undisputed fact. Name calling and whining doesn't dispute the fact.
Repeating your lie won't make it true.