"no name" <oobie@doobie.com> wrote in message
news:5bostv0tf1q794gkh1r0nhghob39l68rkp@4ax.com...

On Sun, 14 Dec 2003 11:40:06 -0800, Bob Officer
<bobofficers.I-hate-Swen@earthlink.net> wrote:

On Fri, 12 Dec 2003 15:33:47 GMT, in alt.usenet.kooks, no name
<oobie@doobie.com> wrote:

On Fri, 12 Dec 2003 13:21:58 GMT, Wally AngleseaT
<wanglese@spammersbigpondareparasites.net.au> wrote:

On Fri, 12 Dec 2003 13:15:21 GMT, no name <oobie@doobie.com> wrote:

On Fri, 12 Dec 2003 06:58:31 GMT, Wally AngleseaT
<wanglese@spammersbigpondareparasites.net.au> wrote:

On Fri, 12 Dec 2003 05:30:44 GMT, no name <oobie@doobie.com> wrote:

On Fri, 12 Dec 2003 02:40:20 GMT, Wally AngleseaT

<wanglese@bigpond.net.au>

wrote:

On Fri, 12 Dec 2003 02:12:56 GMT, no name <oobie@doobie.com> wrote:

I see you have set aside this special time to demonstrate your
kookiness. Well done,.

On Fri, 12 Dec 2003 01:57:21 GMT, Wally AngleseaT

<wanglese@bigpond.net.au>

wrote:

On Thu, 11 Dec 2003 21:05:25 GMT, no name <oobie@doobie.com>

wrote:

On Thu, 11 Dec 2003 20:34:01 GMT, Michael Davis

<mdavis19@ix.netcom.com>

wrote:

<snip>

Evidence is tangible, testable, repeatable and unambiguous.

<snip>

The alien saucer underground at Groom Lake satisfies all those

criteria.

Prove there is one.
Can't?

then STFU

I don't have to prove there is a saucer at Groom because there IS

one there,

and it's alien.  And government insiders are quite aware of it.

As I am.

I love the way your mental gymnastics work. I note with glee that

you

refuse to backup your own fantasy.

Because it's not a fantasy.

Care to PROVE it?

I don't have to prove anything to you.

Well, you have proven you are a nutjob with a loose grip on reality.

No I've proven I have something to say other than name calling,  Name
calling is the hallmark of a loser.

Except this time the label is correctly applied. Then it isn't name
calling.

Yeah it's name calling.  And a sure sign you've lost the argument.

Youhave

to prove me wrong.

So...let me get this straight.  You, without a name or any sort of
credentials, come here and make a claim that you cannot prove and expect us
to accept that as fact.  You offer no proof of your claim.  Then you say to
us that it is a fact until we can prove otherwise.

You make a wildass statement and refuse to back it up, with the exception of
some argument you culled out of your big brother's (pun intended) college
text book.  Perhaps you should have read the entire book as well as listened
to a few lectures so that the information contained therein could be
properly applied.

Frankly, those who may be on a fence about this whole UFO, alien spacecraft
stuff are being pushed over to the skeptic, debunker camp because of the
faulty logic you use to state your case.

All you are doing is playing to the kooks that exist on both ends of the
scale in these newsgroups.

Really...

Honest...

No Kiddin'

That's a FACT Jack...

Woodsy