Re: Ruppert: Advice for Whistleblowers

X-No-Archive: Yes. 
On Tue, 16 Dec 2003 20:52:01 GMT, no name <oobie@doobie.com> wrote:

On Tue, 16 Dec 2003 20:42:05 GMT, Wally Anglesea�
<wanglese@spammersbigpondareparasites.net.au> wrote:

[...]

NO, calling a spade a spade, isn't ad hominem. It is an accurate
description of you , and is a direct consequence of you posting
histoery.
HTH explain it to you kook.


<wipes spittle from monitor>

Chill dude.  So far you've not presented a logical argument yet.  We're all
waiting.

Neither have you. You've made two unsupported declarative statements:
	There is a saucer at Groom Lake
	There is no need to provide evidence 

Until you can fulfill the second statement, the first remains merely a
claim, no matter how you try to spin it.

Further, there is no "burden of refutation." The burden is on, and
only on the claimant, that's you, to provide evidence for his claim.
Merely stating something, and then claiming everybody in the 
intell community knows it, is a logical fallacy in itself.

You can quit trolling now. It was stillborn from the beginning,, and 
you're just not very good at it.



Widdershins


     Science, Logic, and the UFO Debate:
               http://www.primenet.com/~bdzeiler/index.html

Three lies on one line.