| Subject: Re: Ruppert: Advice for Whistleblowers |
| From: House Widdershins |
| Date: 17/12/2003, 15:33 |
| Newsgroups: alt.alien.visitors,alt.alien.research,alt.paranet.ufo,alt.paranet.abduct,alt.usenet.kooks |
X-No-Archive: Yes.
On Tue, 16 Dec 2003 20:30:55 GMT, no name <oobie@doobie.com> wrote:
On Tue, 16 Dec 2003 19:56:46 GMT, Wally Anglesea™
<wanglese@spammersbigpondareparasites.net.au> wrote:
On Tue, 16 Dec 2003 17:54:15 GMT, no name <oobie@doobie.com> wrote:
On Tue, 16 Dec 2003 06:01:15 GMT, Wally Anglesea™
<wanglese@spammersbigpondareparasites.net.au> wrote:
On Tue, 16 Dec 2003 01:35:18 GMT, no name <oobie@doobie.com> wrote:
<SNIP>
Nope, YOu prove your claim about the UFO at groom lake
It's not a claim, but a fact. Facts don't need to be proven no matter how
much you yammer on about it.
Fact: There's an alien saucer at Groom Lake.
It can be verified but not disputed.
The verify it for us
Dance for me kook.
You're making a fool of yourself.
More evasion noted.
Science, Logic, and the UFO Debate:
http://www.primenet.com/~bdzeiler/index.html
Three lies on one line.