On 17 Dec 2003 10:23:39 EST, House Widdershins <sinistre@concentric.net>
wrote:

Chill dude.  So far you've not presented a logical argument yet.  We're all
waiting.

Neither have you. You've made two unsupported declarative statements:
	There is a saucer at Groom Lake
	There is no need to provide evidence 

You're very supportive, thank you -- the wirld intell community thanks you
also.

Until you can fulfill the second statement, the first remains merely a
claim, no matter how you try to spin it.

Meriiam Wesbster is spinning in the grave.

Further, there is no "burden of refutation." The burden is on, and
only on the claimant, that's you, to provide evidence for his claim.

That's a claim, sugar bear, that you can not support.

Merely stating something, and then claiming everybody in the 
intell community knows it, is a logical fallacy in itself.

Well everyone in the intell community knows fer shua now, buddy boy.
The intelligence community, well, a lot of it, has been disinformed as well
as the public about the real deal with super seekrit 'government' ---> read
George Bush and Co. 

You can quit trolling now.

I'm good at flushing.

It was stillborn from the beginning,, and 
you're just not very good at it.

This from a someone who won't admit they know the difference between a claim
and a fact.  You don't anyone, sonny.

There's a alien saucer at Groom Lake.