On Wed, 17 Dec 2003 21:07:12 GMT, Michael Davis
<mdavis19@ix.netcom.com> wrote:

The notorious net kook and mental patient known as pRick Boston 
put on his "Otis Reed" sock and wrote:

On Mon, 15 Dec 2003 22:20:43 GMT, Michael Davis
<mdavis19@ix.netcom.com> wrote:

The notorious net kook and former mental patient known as Mike 
Davis wrote:

On Sun, 14 Dec 2003 21:25:31 GMT, Michael Davis
<mdavis19@ix.netcom.com> wrote:

<snip>

Dumbo, you cannot transmit c
It is impossible. period.

That's not what anyone is asking you to do, kook. It's just a 
straw man argument, and it's wrong anyway. Evidence can be 
transmitted over any medium. 

Dumbo, the argument was not whether 'evidence' can be transmitted,
but 'hard,physical evidence'

No, that's just your silly straw man argument.  Nobody ever demanded
that anyone transmit anything physical over Usenet, kook.

No,it is not a 'strawman' argument,

Irrational denial of the obvious noted.

it was an impossible demand levied

by HW.

"Nope. You made the claim, you get to back it up with hard, physical
unambiguous evidence. Don't have any? That's what I thought."

Where exactly in that paragraph does he demand it be transmitted 
over Usenet? Please be specific, kook.

He made the demand on usenet for no name to supply
Hard, Physical evidence, Dumbo. Since usenet is the medium being
used to communicate to 'no name' his demand was ludicrous, as it would
be impossible for no name to comply over usenet, dumbass.

It is impossible to supply Hard Physical evidence over usenet,

He didn't ask you to, liar. 

So what if he didn't ask me. He asked no name. It is still ludicrous.
How does that make me a liar, Pinhead ?
You just argue for the sake of arguing.

Anyway, at the very least you ought to 
be able to tell us all exactly where and how to find it. If it 
really existed that is.

Why should I ? I have not made any such claim.

you stupid kookanut. You lose, loser.

Nice projection, pRick.

Wrong label, dumbass. I am not pRick.
In your little two bit mind all you see is pRick.
You must be gay. You see pRicks everywhere.
Have a nice suck.

I bought you an Xmas present. It's a T-shirt that says "I'm with 
stupid" and has an arrow on the chest pointing upward. Post your 
address and I'll send it to you. Wear it with pride.

Trying to cull my mailing address from me ?
I don't give out my addy to lunatics, HTH.
Your obsession with pRick is noted, you are far more
interested with him than he is with you. 
I can see why he doesn't post here anymore.

Just like your stupid assumption that there are only two types of
people.

Guess which type you are.

Your mind is so narrow I bet you can split hairs with it, that
is about all it is good for.

Whining about people being narrow minded doesn't hide the fact 
that you assorted kooks and saucer-heads have no evidence 
whatsoever to present to back up your silly fantasies. Sucks to be 
you.

The fact that you are so narrow minded makes it impossible
for you to view the evidence with unbiased reason. Your mind
is already made up that it has to be false. You would lose your little
bitty mind if you discovered that the people you have been frothing
over for many years were right.

 I am not a saucer head. The subject interests me. That's all.
There are hundreds of ex-military personnel who claim there 
are saucers, you ,no doubt, would call them kooks as well.
Stick your pointed head in the sand and deny it all you like,
bet you can't pull your head out. Just because all the evidence
does not convince you does not mean there is no evidence.
You just deny it all, it is all your two bit brain can do.
You just suck