The notorious net kook and mental patient known as pRick Boston
put on his "Otis Reed" sock and wrote:

On Wed, 17 Dec 2003 21:07:12 GMT, Michael Davis
<mdavis19@ix.netcom.com> wrote:

The notorious net kook and mental patient known as pRick Boston put on his "Otis Reed" sock and wrote:

On Mon, 15 Dec 2003 22:20:43 GMT, Michael Davis
<mdavis19@ix.netcom.com> wrote:

The notorious net kook and former mental patient known as Mike Davis wrote:

On Sun, 14 Dec 2003 21:25:31 GMT, Michael Davis
<mdavis19@ix.netcom.com> wrote:

<snip>

Dumbo, you cannot transmit c
It is impossible. period.

That's not what anyone is asking you to do, kook. It's just a straw man argument, and it's wrong anyway. Evidence can be transmitted over any medium.

Dumbo, the argument was not whether 'evidence' can be transmitted,
but 'hard,physical evidence'

No, that's just your silly straw man argument.  Nobody ever demanded
that anyone transmit anything physical over Usenet, kook.

No,it is not a 'strawman' argument,

Irrational denial of the obvious noted.

it was an impossible demand levied

by HW.

"Nope. You made the claim, you get to back it up with hard, physical
unambiguous evidence. Don't have any? That's what I thought."

Where exactly in that paragraph does he demand it be transmitted over Usenet? Please be specific, kook.

He made the demand on usenet for no name to supply
Hard, Physical evidence, Dumbo. Since usenet is the medium being
used to communicate to 'no name' his demand was ludicrous, as it would
be impossible for no name to comply over usenet, dumbass.

So he made the demand on Usenet, BFD. He could have made it over the phone, or in a letter, or by email, or even by carrier pigeon. The medium the demand was made in is irrelevant. And nowhere in that paragraph did he demand the evidence be transmitted over Usenet. Do try to get a grasp on that painfully obvious fact, kook. Get your head out of your ass and quit spinning silly straw man arguments in a lame attempt to try to divert attention away from the inability of you saucer-heads to produce any evidence at all in any medium. Instead why don't you try working on digging up some actual evidence to back up your kooky beliefs.

It is impossible to supply Hard Physical evidence over usenet,

He didn't ask you to, liar.

So what if he didn't ask me. He asked no name.

Then why are you the one frothing? No Name is a complete moron, but he/she seems at least smart enough not to argue the point. That makes you even more on an idiot than it is. Your mother must be so proud.

It is still ludicrous.
How does that make me a liar, Pinhead ?

Let me count the ways you are a liar. First off, you are lying about who you are. You are lying about your past. You are lying about the meaning of the above paragraph. You are lying below when you deny being a saucer-head. It just goes on and on.

You just argue for the sake of arguing.

You just lose every argument because you are a moron and a kook. I can see how that would make you bitter over time. Sucks to be you.

Anyway, at the very least you ought to be able to tell us all exactly where and how to find it. If it really existed that is.

Why should I ? I have not made any such claim.

You are defending the no-name kook. Besides, you've made even more ridiculous claims in the past and never supported them with any evidence, right Shantar?

you stupid kookanut. You lose, loser.

Nice projection, pRick.

Wrong label, dumbass. I am not pRick.

Ok, Shantar then.

In your little two bit mind all you see is pRick.
You must be gay. You see pRicks everywhere.
Have a nice suck.

Projection and homoerotic fantasizing noted.

I bought you an Xmas present. It's a T-shirt that says "I'm with stupid" and has an arrow on the chest pointing upward. Post your address and I'll send it to you. Wear it with pride.

Trying to cull my mailing address from me ?

No, just trying to induce frothing. Hit and score!

I don't give out my addy to lunatics, HTH.
Your obsession with pRick is noted, you are far more
interested with him than he is with you. I can see why he doesn't post here anymore.

Yeah, because you got yourself a new sock puppet.

Just like your stupid assumption that there are only two types of
people.

Guess which type you are.

Your mind is so narrow I bet you can split hairs with it, that
is about all it is good for.

Whining about people being narrow minded doesn't hide the fact that you assorted kooks and saucer-heads have no evidence whatsoever to present to back up your silly fantasies. Sucks to be you.

The fact that you are so narrow minded makes it impossible
for you to view the evidence with unbiased reason. Your mind
is already made up that it has to be false. You would lose your little
bitty mind if you discovered that the people you have been frothing
over for many years were right.

Further pointless whining noted. Cry all you like about your kooky perception of skeptics, but you can't hide the fact that you and the other saucer-heads have zero evidence to back up your silly beliefs. That's the only important point here.

 I am not a saucer head.

Sure you are, pRick.

The subject interests me. That's all.

Face it, the subject obsesses you. You are only a step or two behind major league saucer kooks like Harold Ensle.

There are hundreds of ex-military personnel who claim there are saucers,

See? Right there you prove yourself to be a credulous saucer-head. Claims are just claims, no matter who they come from. Giving more credibility to one group of people making the same totally unsupported claims as other groups is a logical fallacy of the first order. That's just the sort error saucer-heads make.

you ,no doubt, would call them kooks as well.

Or frauds. Ex-military men are notorious braggarts and liars. Credulous rubes like you really love to lap up their tall tales.

Stick your pointed head in the sand and deny it all you like,

I haven't denied anything, kook.

bet you can't pull your head out. Just because all the evidence
does not convince

What evidence? Did you forget that this whole thread is about you saucer-heads being completely incapable of producing any evidence whatsoever?

you does not mean there is no evidence.

No, it's the total lack of evidence means there is no evidence. HTH.

You just deny it all, it is all your two bit brain can do.

Please point out a few instances of me denying anything. Thanks in advance, liar.

You just suck

You're just projecting, pRick.

--
The Evil Michael Davis(tm)
http://www.mdpub.com/scopeworks/
http://skepticult.org Member #264-70198-536
Member #33 1/3 of The "I Have Been Killfiled By Tommy" Club

"There's a sucker born every minute" - David Hannum (often erroneously attributed to P. T. Barnum)