Subject: Re: Ruppert: Advice for Whistleblowers
From: Otis Reed
Date: 19/12/2003, 06:39
Newsgroups: alt.alien.visitors,alt.alien.research,alt.paranet.ufo,alt.paranet.abduct

On Thu, 18 Dec 2003 21:28:44 GMT, Michael Davis
<mdavis19@ix.netcom.com> wrote:

The notorious net kook and mental patient known as pRick Boston
put on his "Otis Reed" sock and wrote:

On Wed, 17 Dec 2003 21:07:12 GMT, Michael Davis
<mdavis19@ix.netcom.com> wrote:


The notorious net kook and mental patient known as pRick Boston 
put on his "Otis Reed" sock and wrote:


On Mon, 15 Dec 2003 22:20:43 GMT, Michael Davis
<mdavis19@ix.netcom.com> wrote:



The notorious net kook and former mental patient known as Mike 
Davis wrote:



On Sun, 14 Dec 2003 21:25:31 GMT, Michael Davis
<mdavis19@ix.netcom.com> wrote:

<snip>

Dumbo, you cannot transmit c
It is impossible. period.

That's not what anyone is asking you to do, kook. It's just a 
straw man argument, and it's wrong anyway. Evidence can be 
transmitted over any medium. 


Dumbo, the argument was not whether 'evidence' can be transmitted,
but 'hard,physical evidence'

No, that's just your silly straw man argument.  Nobody ever demanded
that anyone transmit anything physical over Usenet, kook.


No,it is not a 'strawman' argument,

Irrational denial of the obvious noted.

it was an impossible demand levied

by HW.

"Nope. You made the claim, you get to back it up with hard, physical
unambiguous evidence. Don't have any? That's what I thought."

Where exactly in that paragraph does he demand it be transmitted 
over Usenet? Please be specific, kook.


He made the demand on usenet for no name to supply
Hard, Physical evidence, Dumbo. Since usenet is the medium being
used to communicate to 'no name' his demand was ludicrous, as it would
be impossible for no name to comply over usenet, dumbass.

So he made the demand on Usenet, BFD. He could have made it over 
the phone, or in a letter, or by email, or even by carrier pigeon. 

He could have but he Did not. He made the demand over usenet
to which it is impossible to comply with. What is it about that simple
fact that escapes you ?

The medium the demand was made in is irrelevant. 

Somebody beat you with a dumbass stick or what ?

And nowhere in 
that paragraph did he demand the evidence be transmitted over 
Usenet. 

So fuckin' what ? He made the demand on usenet, the medium
he is using to communicate with no name. The medium in which 
it is impossible to comply to his demand.

Do try to get a grasp on that painfully obvious fact, 

Yes, do try kookanut.

kook. Get your head out of your ass and quit spinning silly straw 
man arguments in a lame attempt to try to divert attention away 
>from the inability of you saucer-heads to produce any evidence at 
all in any medium. Instead why don't you try working on digging up 
some actual evidence to back up your kooky beliefs.

Instead, why don't you try not making impossible demands ?
You and your Hard Physical evidence, if there was any Hard 
evidence it most certainly would be locked away, because the 
people in control know people like you would lose what little mind
they have. You would not go to work and twinky production would
stop. Utter chaos. No twinkies. The Horror.
 
It is impossible to supply Hard Physical evidence over usenet,

He didn't ask you to, liar. 


So what if he didn't ask me. He asked no name.

Then why are you the one frothing? No Name is a complete moron, 
but he/she seems at least smart enough not to argue the point. 
That makes you even more on an idiot than it is. Your mother must 
be so proud.

Don't bring my mother into this honky or I will kick your ass up
around your cocksucker. 

It is still ludicrous.
How does that make me a liar, Pinhead ?

Let me count the ways you are a liar. First off, you are lying 
about who you are. You are lying about your past. You are lying 
about the meaning of the above paragraph. You are lying below when 
you deny being a saucer-head. It just goes on and on.

Yes, your delusion does go on and on. 
I am not lying about who I am, but since it is impossible to convince
you otherwise you can just wallow in your pit of ignorance. It is
quite funny watching you trying to hit a nerve with me. You are way to
obsessed with this pRick, seek help.
How am I lying about the paragraph, it speaks for itself, a demand for
Hard Physical evidence made over usenet, to which it is impossible to
comply. 


You just argue for the sake of arguing.

You just lose every argument because you are a moron and a kook. I 
can see how that would make you bitter over time. Sucks to be you.

You just plain suck, have a nice one.
 
Anyway, at the very least you ought to 
be able to tell us all exactly where and how to find it. If it 
really existed that is.


Why should I ? I have not made any such claim.

You are defending the no-name kook. 

No I am not. You and your 'buddies' are the ones obsessed with 
'sides' . In your narrow view of the world you think everyone must be
on one side or the other. A tremendous fallacy of logic. I am on my
own side. Not yours, not 'no name's side, but my side. I know that is
a bit too much for your two bit brain to fathom.


Besides, you've made even more 
ridiculous claims in the past and never supported them with any 
evidence, right Shantar?

I would help if you knew who you were 'talking' to.

you stupid kookanut. You lose, loser.

Nice projection, pRick.

You like a pRick projection ? I knew you were gay.

Wrong label, dumbass. I am not pRick.

Ok, Shantar then.

Whatever........


In your little two bit mind all you see is pRick.
You must be gay. You see pRicks everywhere.
Have a nice suck.

Projection and homoerotic fantasizing noted.

Why must you fantasize about it ? 
You must be gay.
You have proven that countless times. Just come to terms 
with your homosexuality and stop trying to bash people who 
aren't of your particular orientation. You will be less hostile
and it should lower your blood pressure.

I bought you an Xmas present. It's a T-shirt that says "I'm with 
stupid" and has an arrow on the chest pointing upward. Post your 
address and I'll send it to you. Wear it with pride.


Trying to cull my mailing address from me ?

No, just trying to induce frothing. Hit and score!

Score 0. You are the only one frothing here.

I don't give out my addy to lunatics, HTH.
Your obsession with pRick is noted, you are far more
interested with him than he is with you. 
I can see why he doesn't post here anymore.

Yeah, because you got yourself a new sock puppet.

Whatever...........




Just like your stupid assumption that there are only two types of
people.

Guess which type you are.

I don't give a care which one of two boxes you try to put me in.

Your mind is so narrow I bet you can split hairs with it, that
is about all it is good for.

Whining about people being narrow minded doesn't hide the fact 
that you assorted kooks and saucer-heads have no evidence 
whatsoever to present to back up your silly fantasies. Sucks to be 
you.


The fact that you are so narrow minded makes it impossible
for you to view the evidence with unbiased reason. Your mind
is already made up that it has to be false. You would lose your little
bitty mind if you discovered that the people you have been frothing
over for many years were right.

Further pointless whining noted. Cry all you like about your kooky 
perception of skeptics, but you can't hide the fact that you and 
the other saucer-heads have zero evidence to back up your silly 
beliefs. That's the only important point here.

All the evidence anyone has ever tried to give you, you just name call
and bury your head deeper into the sands of ignorance. 
Since you have already made up your mind , it is impossible for you
to learn anything from any of these debates

 I am not a saucer head.

Sure you are, pRick.

The subject interests me. That's all.

Face it, the subject obsesses you. You are only a step or two 
behind major league saucer kooks like Harold Ensle.

There are hundreds of ex-military personnel who claim there 
are saucers,

See? Right there you prove yourself to be a credulous saucer-head. 

That is 'YOUR' interpretation.
I did not say if I believed them or not.
YOU just assume that because in your limited vision you only see two
sides.


Claims are just claims, no matter who they come from. 

Bullsnot, people who are under oaths of secrecy, who come forward
out of a belief that people have a right to know, is not your barnyard
type of claim.

Giving more 
credibility to one group of people making the same totally 
unsupported claims as other groups is a logical fallacy of the 
first order. 

Bullsnot, ex-military people who were 'at' places where these 
events supposedly happened are more credible that John Q. Public
who has no idea what the capabilities of USAF aircraft are.

That's just the sort error saucer-heads make.

Yeah, trying to debate with imbeciles like you. 

you ,no doubt, would call them kooks as well.

Or frauds. Ex-military men are notorious braggarts and liars. 
Credulous rubes like you really love to lap up their tall tales.

Some could be frauds, but for what purpose ? 
Why would they want to bring a busload of grief into their lives ?


Stick your pointed head in the sand and deny it all you like,

I haven't denied anything, kook.

ROTFLMAO


bet you can't pull your head out. Just because all the evidence
does not convince

What evidence? Did you forget that this whole thread is about you 
saucer-heads being completely incapable of producing any evidence 
whatsoever?

Me, saucer head ? Lol. 
Did you forget I am not a saucer head, which may be why I
haven't produced any evidence ? (now here is where you 
will claim I am a saucer head.)


you does not mean there is no evidence.

No, it's the total lack of evidence means there is no evidence. HTH.

It is your constant denial of 'any' evidence that you use to convince 
yourself there is no evidence. HTH

You just deny it all, it is all your two bit brain can do.

Please point out a few instances of me denying anything. Thanks in 
advance, liar.

For one, you deny that there are more than two types of people.
You deny that anyone with Alien info could be anything else than a
kook or fraud. You deny God. You deny any credibility to any witness
of a UFO sighting. You deny that I am Otis........should I go on ?

You are just a name calling freak that has problems with their
sexuality. Get over it already. Have a good suck. You know you
really want to.