The notorious net kook and mental patient known as pRick Boston
put on his "Otis Reed" sock and wrote:

On Thu, 18 Dec 2003 21:28:44 GMT, Michael Davis
<mdavis19@ix.netcom.com> wrote:

The notorious net kook and mental patient known as pRick Boston
put on his "Otis Reed" sock and wrote:

On Wed, 17 Dec 2003 21:07:12 GMT, Michael Davis
<mdavis19@ix.netcom.com> wrote:

The notorious net kook and mental patient known as pRick Boston put on his "Otis Reed" sock and wrote:

On Mon, 15 Dec 2003 22:20:43 GMT, Michael Davis
<mdavis19@ix.netcom.com> wrote:

The notorious net kook and former mental patient known as Mike Davis wrote:

On Sun, 14 Dec 2003 21:25:31 GMT, Michael Davis
<mdavis19@ix.netcom.com> wrote:

<snip>

Dumbo, you cannot transmit c
It is impossible. period.

That's not what anyone is asking you to do, kook. It's just a straw man argument, and it's wrong anyway. Evidence can be transmitted over any medium.

Dumbo, the argument was not whether 'evidence' can be transmitted,
but 'hard,physical evidence'

No, that's just your silly straw man argument.  Nobody ever demanded
that anyone transmit anything physical over Usenet, kook.

No,it is not a 'strawman' argument,

Irrational denial of the obvious noted.

it was an impossible demand levied

by HW.

"Nope. You made the claim, you get to back it up with hard, physical
unambiguous evidence. Don't have any? That's what I thought."

Where exactly in that paragraph does he demand it be transmitted over Usenet? Please be specific, kook.

He made the demand on usenet for no name to supply
Hard, Physical evidence, Dumbo. Since usenet is the medium being
used to communicate to 'no name' his demand was ludicrous, as it would
be impossible for no name to comply over usenet, dumbass.

So he made the demand on Usenet, BFD. He could have made it over the phone, or in a letter, or by email, or even by carrier pigeon.

He could have but he Did not.

And I suppose you would be making this silly argument no matter what medium was used to make the demand. It's all just a smokescreen you are putting up to try to divert attention away from the total lack of any evidence.

He made the demand over usenet

Irrelevant.

to which it is impossible to comply with.

Irrelevant.

What is it about that simple
fact that escapes you ?

Why you can't see that it is irrelevant. HTH, kook.

The medium the demand was made in is irrelevant.

Somebody beat you with a dumbass stick or what ?

Please explain in detail, citing recognized authorities to back up your arguments as you go, how the medium of communication is in any way relevant. After all, the demand had to come through some medium. Nowhere in the demand was the medium for presenting the evidence stated or even implied.

And nowhere in that paragraph did he demand the evidence be transmitted over Usenet.

So fuckin' what ? He made the demand on usenet,

Much like a neutered dog, you just don't get it. The medium the demand is made in is *irrelevant* period.

the medium
he is using to communicate with no name. The medium in which it is impossible to comply to his demand.

So? Why are you still waving this silly straw man argument around? You aren't fooling anyone. Do you enjoy looking stupid?

Do try to get a grasp on that painfully obvious fact,

Yes, do try kookanut.

I've already got it. I can read for comprehension. You should try it sometime.

kook. Get your head out of your ass and quit spinning silly straw man arguments in a lame attempt to try to divert attention away 

from the inability of you saucer-heads to produce any evidence at

all in any medium. Instead why don't you try working on digging up some actual evidence to back up your kooky beliefs.

Instead, why don't you try not making impossible demands ?

Asking for evidence is never an impossible demand unless the subject in question is not real. HTH.

You and your Hard Physical evidence, if there was any Hard evidence it most certainly would be locked away,

Ah, I was wondering when you would drag in the typical, idiotic, saucer-head claim of a perfect, world-wide, conspiracy to suppress the "TRVTH" about aliens. Still claim you aren't a saucer-head, prick?

because the people in control know people like you would lose what little mind
they have. You would not go to work and twinky production would
stop. Utter chaos. No twinkies. The Horror.

So, exactly how long have you been a paranoid conspiracy loon?

 

It is impossible to supply Hard Physical evidence over usenet,

He didn't ask you to, liar.

So what if he didn't ask me. He asked no name.

Then why are you the one frothing? No Name is a complete moron, but he/she seems at least smart enough not to argue the point. That makes you even more on an idiot than it is. Your mother must be so proud.

Don't bring my mother into this honky or I will kick your ass up
around your cocksucker.

Your mother is my cocksucker. HTH.

It is still ludicrous.
How does that make me a liar, Pinhead ?

Let me count the ways you are a liar. First off, you are lying about who you are. You are lying about your past. You are lying about the meaning of the above paragraph. You are lying below when you deny being a saucer-head. It just goes on and on.

Yes, your delusion does go on and on. I am not lying about who I am,

There! You just lied again, pRick.

but since it is impossible to convince
you otherwise you can just wallow in your pit of ignorance.

There isn't room for both of us in there. I'll have to wait for you to get out.

It is
quite funny watching you trying to hit a nerve with me.

And succeeding with ease.

You are way to
obsessed with this pRick, seek help.
How am I lying about the paragraph, it speaks for itself, a demand for
Hard Physical evidence made over usenet,

That's the lie. The paragraph says no such thing.

to which it is impossible to
comply.

Face it, it's impossible for you saucer heads to comply over any medium.

You just argue for the sake of arguing.

You just lose every argument because you are a moron and a kook. I can see how that would make you bitter over time. Sucks to be you.

You just plain suck, have a nice one.

Lame IKYABWAI noted.

 

Anyway, at the very least you ought to be able to tell us all exactly where and how to find it. If it really existed that is.

Why should I ? I have not made any such claim.

You are defending the no-name kook.

No I am not.

Irrational denial of reality noted.

You and your 'buddies' are the ones obsessed with 'sides' . In your narrow view of the world you think everyone must be
on one side or the other.

Everyone *is* on one side or the other. Denying it is stupid.

A tremendous fallacy of logic. I am on my
own side.

But nobody else is.

Not yours, not 'no name's side, but my side. I know that is
a bit too much for your two bit brain to fathom.

Yeah, I don't grok insanity.

Besides, you've made even more ridiculous claims in the past and never supported them with any evidence, right Shantar?

I would help if you knew who you were 'talking' to.

pRick Boston's latest sock puppet.

you stupid kookanut. You lose, loser.

Nice projection, pRick.

You like a pRick projection ? I knew you were gay.

Projection noted.

Wrong label, dumbass. I am not pRick.

Ok, Shantar then.

Whatever........

In your little two bit mind all you see is pRick.
You must be gay. You see pRicks everywhere.
Have a nice suck.

Projection and homoerotic fantasizing noted.

Why must you fantasize about it ?

I was talking about you, pRick.

You must be gay.

You must be projecting again.

You have proven that countless times. Just come to terms with your homosexuality and stop trying to bash people who aren't of your particular orientation. You will be less hostile
and it should lower your blood pressure.

Feel the froth!

I bought you an Xmas present. It's a T-shirt that says "I'm with stupid" and has an arrow on the chest pointing upward. Post your address and I'll send it to you. Wear it with pride.

Trying to cull my mailing address from me ?

No, just trying to induce frothing. Hit and score!

Score 0. You are the only one frothing here.

More irrational denial of reality noted.

I don't give out my addy to lunatics, HTH.
Your obsession with pRick is noted, you are far more
interested with him than he is with you. I can see why he doesn't post here anymore.

Yeah, because you got yourself a new sock puppet.

Whatever...........

Just like your stupid assumption that there are only two types of
people.

Guess which type you are.

I don't give a care which one of two boxes you try to put me in.

Then don't whine when you get classified as the kook you are.

Your mind is so narrow I bet you can split hairs with it, that
is about all it is good for.

Whining about people being narrow minded doesn't hide the fact that you assorted kooks and saucer-heads have no evidence whatsoever to present to back up your silly fantasies. Sucks to be you.

The fact that you are so narrow minded makes it impossible
for you to view the evidence with unbiased reason. Your mind
is already made up that it has to be false. You would lose your little
bitty mind if you discovered that the people you have been frothing
over for many years were right.

Further pointless whining noted. Cry all you like about your kooky perception of skeptics, but you can't hide the fact that you and the other saucer-heads have zero evidence to back up your silly beliefs. That's the only important point here.

All the evidence anyone has ever tried to give you,

Nobody has ever attempted to produce any real evidence.

you just name call
and bury your head deeper into the sands of ignorance. Since you have already made up your mind , it is impossible for you
to learn anything from any of these debates

This is not a debate. You are simply whining about skeptics and putting up a smokescreen in a futile effort to hide the fact that you saucer-heads have zero evidence to support your fantasies. You aren't fooling anyone.

I am not a saucer head.

Sure you are, pRick.

The subject interests me. That's all.

Face it, the subject obsesses you. You are only a step or two behind major league saucer kooks like Harold Ensle.

There are hundreds of ex-military personnel who claim there are saucers,

See? Right there you prove yourself to be a credulous saucer-head.

That is 'YOUR' interpretation.

That's the obvious and correct interpretation. HTH.

I did not say if I believed them or not.

Then why bring them up? Are you in the habit of citing testimony from people you *don't* believe?

YOU just assume that because in your limited vision you only see two
sides.

There are only two sides. Deal with it.

Claims are just claims, no matter who they come from.

Bullsnot, people who are under oaths of secrecy, who come forward
out of a belief that people have a right to know, is not your barnyard
type of claim.

It is precisely a barnyard type of claim since it is as much horse shit as any other baseless claim.

Giving more credibility to one group of people making the same totally unsupported claims as other groups is a logical fallacy of the first order.

Bullsnot, ex-military people who were 'at' places where these events supposedly happened are more credible that John Q. Public
who has no idea what the capabilities of USAF aircraft are.

Says who? You? But you're just a kook. Baseless, bullshit claims are just baseless, bullshit claims no matter who is making them.

That's just the sort error saucer-heads make.

Yeah, trying to debate

Well, a man ought to know his limitations.

with imbeciles like you.

you ,no doubt, would call them kooks as well.

Or frauds. Ex-military men are notorious braggarts and liars. Credulous rubes like you really love to lap up their tall tales.

Some could be frauds, but for what purpose ?

For the same purpose anyone commits fraud.

Why would they want to bring a busload of grief into their lives ?

What grief? Show me an example of a saucer-head being persecuted.

Stick your pointed head in the sand and deny it all you like,

I haven't denied anything, kook.

ROTFLMAO

bet you can't pull your head out. Just because all the evidence
does not convince

What evidence? Did you forget that this whole thread is about you saucer-heads being completely incapable of producing any evidence whatsoever?

Me, saucer head ?

Yep.

Lol.

Yeah, it is funny, but I'm not laughing *with* you, kook.

Did you forget I am not a saucer head, which may be why I
haven't produced any evidence ?

Have you forgotten that you show all the traits of a typical saucer-head, including the refusal to produce any evidence?

(now here is where you will claim I am a saucer head.)

You sure are doing your best to make yourself look like a saucer-head, pRick.

you does not mean there is no evidence.

No, it's the total lack of evidence means there is no evidence. HTH.

It is your constant denial of 'any' evidence

What evidence?

that you use to convince yourself there is no evidence. HTH

What evidence?

You just deny it all, it is all your two bit brain can do.

Please point out a few instances of me denying anything. Thanks in advance, liar.

For one, you deny that there are more than two types of people.

Show me a third type.

You deny that anyone with Alien info could be anything else than a
kook or fraud.

Actually, it's just that I've never found anyone with any "alien info" as you call it. They only ever seem to have a bunch of baseless, bullshit stories and maybe a couple of uselessly bad photos. That hardly qualifies as info to anyone with a fully functioning mind.

You deny God.

Show me even the tiniest scrap of hard evidence (via the medium of your choice) that any god(s) exist.

You deny any credibility to any witness
of a UFO sighting.

Just saying you saw an unidentified object is a very credible claim. Once the witnesses start claiming that the unidentified object must have been an alien spacecraft or other extraordinary object though, they destroy their own credibility. HTH, kook.

You deny that I am Otis

That's because you are really pRick. You aren't fooling anyone, kook.

........should I go on ?

More than you go on already?

You are just a name calling freak

Oh the hypocrisy!

that has problems with their
sexuality.

No, you are thinking of Roberta.

Get over it already. Have a good suck. You know you
really want to.

request denied. Do you often cruise Usenet asking other men to "have a suck?" And you say I have problems?

--
The Evil Michael Davis(tm)
http://www.mdpub.com/scopeworks/
http://skepticult.org Member #264-70198-536
Member #33 1/3 of The "I Have Been Killfiled By Tommy" Club

"There's a sucker born every minute" - David Hannum (often erroneously attributed to P. T. Barnum)