On Sat, 20 Dec 2003 17:30:35 +0000 (UTC), Jon Fleming
<jonf@fleming-nospam.com> wrote:

On Sat, 20 Dec 2003 10:59:45 +0000 (UTC), "Roadrunner"
<pegasus@privat.utfors.se> wrote:

"David Horn" <askifyoureallywannaknow@cox.net> wrote in message
news:pan.2003.12.19.14.19.05.235878@cox.net...

On Fri, 19 Dec 2003 13:14:07 +0000, Ed Conrad wrote:

[Snip]

[Follow-ups reset to talk.origins]

As usual, Conrad set his follow-ups to sci.anthropology.paleo with
specific intent to disrupt that group.  Conrad's lunacies do not belong in
the sci.* groups.

Conrad is a liar and a coward.  If anyone has any questions about that,
they need only ask.  The details are quite well-known.

His bring ups have by far not been adressed scientifically in any way, that
is as far as I have seen.  One just came to the opinion he is so deadwrong
based on prejudice, not because of valid counter arguments.

<
================================================
<
Of course, you -- a pseudo -- are deliberately ignoring the very
favorable results discovered via a CATscan of the specimen 
that Wilton M. Krogman, one of the world's foremost experts 
on human anatomy, identified as a calvarium, a human skull
with the eye sockets broken off.

You are also dismissing the very favorable state-of-the-art testing
results on the specimen found inside the original skull-like object
that Krogman identified as a petrified premolar.

And, of course, you want nothing to do with the confirmation
of petrified bone as determined, via testing, by Dr. Jremey Dahl,
then one of the leading bone experts at Yerkes Regional
Primate Resarch Center in Atlanta, Ga., the most prestigious
institution of its kind in the world.

Of course, you must also forget about the testing of several
key specimens -- most of them petrified human remains -- that
was performed at American Medical Laboratories in Chantilly, Va.,
revealing the presence of calcium oxalate dihydrate as well
as dried blood.

Meanwhile, you have totally ignored the SEM photos -- at
2,000X -- that reveal a dramatic similiarity with the internal
surface features of bone as compared with the specimen that
Krogman identified as a tibia.

You and your evolutionistic colleagues are nothing but a sorry
lot of sleazeballs, slimballs and sumbags, and your  "science"
is relegated to deceit, deception, collusion and conspiracy --
certainly not a pursuit of Truth, no matter where it leads..

You fear honesty and integrity in true science, therefore resort
to every despicable trick in the book -- even tampering with
physical evidence -- to prevent cold, hard facts from destroying
your fictional, facetious theory of the evolution of man.

No surprise, really. The late, great Immanuel Velikovsky hit
the nail on the head when he remarked, "Ridicule is the argument
of the mob."

Ed Conrad

http://www.edconrad.com

Man as Old as Coal
<
=============================================

lrt to >

"The details are quite known!"  yeah, sure they are.

Yes, they are; well known by those who have made the slightest effort
to find out, rather than making unfounded assumptions based only on
their prejudices. 

e.g.
<http://www.geo.ucalgary.ca/~macrae/t_origins/carbbones/carbbones.html>
<http://homepage.mac.com/myers/misc/bone.html><http://pharyngula.org/comments/184_0_1_0_C/>
<http://www.google.com/groups?q=ed+conrad+lab+blood+group:talk.origins&hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&selm=qil1lvs4me9nav6nige9ml7lot04ael1tv%404ax.com&rnum=1>
<http://www.google.com/groups?q=ed+conrad+lab+blood+group:talk.origins+author:dana+author:tweedy&hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&selm=blitcd%24clpaj%241%40ID-35161.news.uni-berlin.de&rnum=1>
<http://www.google.com/groups?q=ed+conrad+lab+blood+AML+%22doesn%27t+test%22+group:talk.origins+author:dana+author:tweedy&hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&scoring=d&selm=bnjo6c%2411e50m%241%40ID-35161.news.uni-berlin.de&rnum=1>

--  
Replace nospam with group to email