In article <83tnuvgbm7dsaoeie3i7g0n8182429r34b@4ax.com>, Wally Anglesea� says...

On Thu, 25 Dec 2003 20:54:34 GMT, Sir Arthur C.B.E. Wholeflaffers
�.S.�. <nospam@newsranger.com> wrote:

Please be advised that this newsgroup WILL shut down to
all debunkers, trolls, non-researchers, useful idiots,
CIA/NSA/NASA spOOks (take note O-BORG and Borsch),
and other people "we" deem that are a disruptive element!

If you think you qualify as one of the subversives
on this group, then you most certainly are.  

If you match up to the following list,
this is a  warning that this group is closed to you:

KooKs: Patrick, Wilson, U. "Whore-House" Bob, Hughe/Sucke, 
Davis, Useful Idiot Jeff George, R. Quack, Whorelow, EEL
GooGooian, ASF-Wipe, Chen-Destabilizers, Wider "Anal" Sham-
D. Hertz,  Lewis, Chump-Pest, Cap. Mak Shitley,  
Wally Anglesea, Howell, Twit, The Sludge/Sage

spOOks: Borsch, Echelon Spin-etti, Adams, Weller, O-BORG,
Wisenheimer, Cadwell

Good riddance to all you bad rubbish!

Merry Christmas Artie. Now go fuck yourself.

Either way, you are no LONGER welcome on these
newsgroups.  So take the rest of your Cult with you
and scram!!

By eliminating ALL debunkers, you
would be helping mankind.

Yes, here is the PROOF:

ROYAL SOCIETY REPORT: ALREADY MAY BE TOO MANY HUMANS TO SUSTAIN SPECIES

JENNIFER VIEGAS, DISCOVERY NEWS - A study that compared humans with other
species concluded there are 1,000 times too many humans to be sustainable. The
study, published in the current Proceedings B (Biological Sciences) by the Royal
Society, used a statistical device known as "confidence limits" to measure what
the sustainable norm should be for species populations. Other factors, such as
carbon dioxide production, energy use, biomass consumption, and geographical
range were taken into consideration. 
"Our study found that when we compare ourselves to otherwise similar species,
usually other mammals of our same body size, for example, we are abnormal and
the situation is unsustainable," said Charles Fowler, co-author of the paper and
a lead researcher at the National Marine Mammal Laboratory, a division of the
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. . .  

Such pathologies can be alleviated, according to the paper, but changes would
have to be profound and widespread. "It is probably not unrealistic to say that
nothing less than a full paradigm shift is required to get there from here,"
Fowler explained. "It requires changes in our thinking, belief systems and
understanding of ourselves." 

William Rees, professor of community and regional planning at the University of
British Columbia. . . said that we may be "fatally successful." He agrees that
industrial society as presently configured is unsustainable. "In the past 25
years we have adopted a near-universal myth of �sustainable development� based
on continuous economic growth through globalization and freer trade," Rees wrote
in a recent Bulletin of Science, Technology, and Society paper. "Because the
assumptions hidden in the globalization myth are incompatible with biophysical
reality the myth reinforces humanity�s already dysfunctional ecological
behavior."