| Subject: Re: EVOLUTION OF MAN -- Pseudoscience Not Science |
| From: lensman1955@hotmail.com (lensman1955) |
| Date: 27/12/2003, 16:00 |
| Newsgroups: sci.anthropology,alt.fan.art-bell,sci.skeptic,alt.alien.visitors,alt.alien.research,alt.paranet.ufo,alt.paranet.abduct |
sholyman1w@yahoo.com (Douglas Falknor) wrote in message news:<43051d2c.0312261918.3b85323f@posting.google.com>...
"Carl R. Osterwald" <i@mac.com> wrote in message news:<251220032134159707%i@mac.com>...
In article <H_HGb.5440$85.236@www.newsranger.com>, Sir Arthur C.B.E.
Wholeflaffers Å.S.Å. <nospam@newsranger.com> wrote:
Perhaps even more ridiculous as the Big Bang Theory!
Wholeflapper is spamming afa-b again -- must be running low on marks.
-=-=-=-=-
Trying to follow this string, it seems the evidence of "no human
evolution" is a finger in coal deposits? Seems to be a scant fossil
record compared to all the skulls and bones that I've seen that have
been unearthed so far.
Please present your corroborating evidence--Carbon dating should work
pretty well on coal, I should think. Then the age of the finger will
tell the story.
Analysis of the finger's DNA can almost be used to date the finger,
but will show where it came from with respect to it's match to human
genetics.
He claims he has numerous fossils found "between" coal beds, which
implies to me that the fossils (if they in fact are not simply funny
rocks) were over the coal bed which then folded or slid a section
[over] the fossils (rocks). I've brought this up several times and he
never responds to me. (He did respond once, but it was a "yes, yes,
no" sort of thing with no real evidence. He also named one of the
"fossils" after me!)