A very thought provoking theory, I will look for further comments from you.
                                  Suzanne Ballard
"�K� W�K?� �F�" <nospam@newsranger.com> wrote in message
news:12MGb.5559$85.125@www.newsranger.com...

In article <cf7c5642.0312250452.f05095e@posting.google.com>, X98 says...

In the name of the Creator of Jesus

Peace,

"Was Jesus a clone?"

Well if you believe Rael, the prophet of the atheistic cult of the
Raelians he was and still is a clone. Sound crazy? Well we are soon to
learn that the Raelians have in fact cloned a human being. This
abomination was born one year ago tomorrow on December 26, 2002. The
Raelians also say they have reversed the aging process. This should be
great news to the vanity soaked western world who for the most part
worship their own image in the form of something they call Jesus. When
the news of the medical evidence hits the airwaves much of this world
will flock to the Raelians... begging them for the opportunity to
reverse the aging of their bodies and clones their dead heroes. like
Hitler. These greed-encompassed people will gladly accept the words of
the Satanic Raelians as the "holy truth." Once the Raelians prove that
cloning is possible, the question for many them will be...

"Was Jesus a Clone?"

Actually, it is possible that Mary, the woman who gave birth to Jesus,
may God bless them both forever, was impregnated by some alien group.
To make a clone you need only have a "segregate womb" in which to grow
the thing. So, following the process of cloning it appears that it is
a definite possibility that Jesus was a clone. But how are we to know
for sure about this? Truth is we can't be what the rationalists call
"sure" about this question or anything else for that matter. To know
if Jesus was a clone takes faith and faith is something the
technophiles reject. They reject faith even though all of their
experimentation relies on their projections of future events based on
previously documented evidences and a belief that the unknown is a
reality not know to them at that time, but will manifest... i.e., they
have "faith" in what the future will be.

Concerning the birth of Jesus, peace be upon him, we have little
historical evidence of him ever existing outside of the curious
absents of Hebrew history from those years. He is however confirmed to
have existed by three religious literary records of him and his birth.
Of the three only two sources report that he was born of a virgin and
that he was of God. Those two records in order are;

1. The Bible [New Testament]
2. The Holy Quran.

The third document that confirms that he was in fact a real person
says that he was a bastard born of Mary who played the harlot. This
book is called the Talmud and is the [holy book?] of the state of
Israel. Is..Rael the prophet and the terrorist state of IS.RAEL one
and the same? Of course they are.
http://www.geocities.com/endtimedeception/rael.htm

Sanhedrin 106a.... Says Jesus' mother was a whore: "She who was the
descendant of princes and governors played the harlot with
carpenters." Also in footnote #2 to Shabbath 104b it is stated that in
the "uncensored" text of the Talmud it is written that Jesus mother,
"Mary the hairdresser," had sex with many men.
http://www.jews-for-allah.org/Jews-not-for-Judaism/talmud_on_jews.htm

But lets not deal with the people of [Antichrist] whose book says that
Jesus "is not of God," accept to say that according to this account of
the modern Pharisees... Jesus could defiantly NOT be a clone.

1 John 4:3
And every spirit that confesseth not that Jesus Christ is come in the
flesh is not of God: and this is that spirit of antichrist, whereof ye
have heard that it should come; and even now already is it in the
world.

According to the Bible [New Testament] Jesus, peace be upon him, was
born of a virgin and was of God... The Compassionate.

Mathew 1:18
Now the birth of Jesus Christ was on this wise: When as his mother
Mary was espoused to Joseph, before they came together, she was found
with child of the Holy Ghost.


According to the Holy Quran, Jesus, peace be upon him, was born of a
virgin and was of God... The Compassionate.

(3:42-47)
16. And mention in the Book (the Quran, O' Muhammad, the story of)
Mary, when she withdrew from her family to a secluded place facing
East.
17. She placed a screen (to screen herself) from them; then We sent to
her Our Spirit (Angel Gabriel), and he appeared before her in the form
of a man in all respects.
18. She said, "Verily! I seek refuge with the Most Beneficent (Allah)

>from you, if you do fear Allah."

19. (The Angel) said, "I am only a Messenger from your Lord, (to
announce) to you the gift of a righteous son."
20. She said, "How can I have a son, when no man has touched me, nor
am I unchaste?"
21. He said, "So (it will be), your Lord said, 'That is easy for Me
(Allah): And (We want) to appoint him as a sign to mankind and a Mercy

>from Us (Allah), and it is a matter (already) decreed, (by Allah).' "

http://www.al-shia.com/html/eng/quran/the-miracle/an-introduction-to-islam-

for-non-muslims/jesus_and_mary_in_the_quran.html#Her%20Upbringing%20and%20th
e%20Announcement%20of%20Jesus'%20Birth

Technically speaking, since the birth occurred as result of no sexual
union, these accounts confirm that Jesus, peace be upon him, could be
a clone. However, the belief that this birth was a divine act by the
Compassionate God in a manner outside of human comprehension,
discounts this possibly. It is discounted because cloning requires the
premeditate murder of millions of unborn children in the "harvesting"
of stem cells. Further more, Jesus' birth, upon whom be peace, could
not be the result of cloning technology because of the wanton destruct
of the environment which is a necessary result of technological
advancements. The Compassionate God does not murder innocents or
destroy the environment as we are led to believe by the Talmud and the
Old Testament.

So according to all three accounts of the person known to us as Jesus,
the blessed son of Mary, could NOT be a clone.

According to these two accounts of, Jesus, may Allah speed his return,
he is a two thousand year old man who is somewhere in outer space
heading this way with an army to kill the lovers of technology and
every bastardized clone.

These words I write and the dedication of my heart is to assist him in
his work to destroy the wicked beings of this generation, which is the
cruelest generation this world has ever seen!

Revelation 11:18

And the nations were angry, and thy wrath is come, and the time of the
dead, that they should be judged, and that thou shouldest give reward
unto thy servants the prophets, and to the saints, and them that fear
thy name, small and great; and shouldest destroy them which destroy
the earth.

[Note]

Human cloning and genes brochure basic science stem cells embryo
genetics reproductive clone

http://www.arhp.org/patienteducation/onlinebrochures/cloning/index.cfm?ID=2

82

"In sexual reproduction a child gets half its genes from its mother
(in her egg) and half from its father (in his sperm):"
"Cloning is an asexual form of reproduction. All the child's genes
would come from a body cell of a single individual: "

"Who is the clonal child's genetic mother or father? As we understand
those terms, a clonal child wouldn't have a genetic mother or father,
it would have a single 'nuclear donor.' If a man cloned himself, would
the child be that man's son or his twin brother? It would be neither,
it would be a new category of biological relationship: his clone"



Nemo Me Impune Lacessit

* Death to all Clones*
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/WACOuncensored/message/141


Andrew X98