Proven liar "Alexa Cameron" <oobie@doobie.com> wrote in message
news:pb26vvcb1h195ftpcocm8e7g6jvecsbnp8@4ax.com...

On Wed, 31 Dec 2003 11:59:11 -0500, Doktor DynaSoar <targeting@OMCL.mil>
wrote:

On Wed, 31 Dec 2003 04:59:21 GMT, no name <oobie@doobie.com> wrote:

} On Tue, 30 Dec 2003 23:57:30 -0500, "Dick Hertz (Hey, who's Dick

Hertz?)"

} <me@example.com> wrote:
}
} >x-no-archive: yes
} >
} >Alexa "no name" Cameron has a brand new box of crayons:
} >> On Tue, 30 Dec 2003 23:27:42 -0500, "Dick Hertz (Hey, who's Dick

Hertz?)"

} >> <me@example.com> wrote:
} >>
} >>
} >>>x-no-archive: yes
} >>>
} >>>Doktor DynaSoar wrote:
} >>>
} >>>>On Tue, 30 Dec 2003 17:03:53 -0700, Phoenix <saddam@spiderhole.NOT>
} >>>>wrote:
} >>>>
} >>>>} In article <g0c3vvg3cr6rambjo72vdpr41sjpn59td2@4ax.com>, Doktor

DynaSoar <targeting@OMCL.mil> wrote:

} >>>>}
} >>>>} > On Tue, 30 Dec 2003 07:51:59 GMT, Sir Arthur C.B.E.

Wholeflaffers

} >>>>} > �.S.�. <nospam@newsranger.com> wrote:
} >>>>} >
} >>>>} > } IMPORTANT NOTICE TO ALL DEBUNKERS AND TROLLS:
} >>>>} >
} >>>>} > IMPOTENT NAUGHTIES FOR ALL TRUNKERS AND DEBOLLS:
} >>>>} >
} >>>>} > } As you must all know, your deadline has past and
} >>>>} > } all debunkers and trolls can NO LONGER post on these groups.
} >>>>} >
} >>>>} > Wrong.
} >>>>}
} >>>>} You believe Art is fallible?
} >>>>
} >>>>I believe Fart is beable.
} >>>>
} >>>
} >>>I believe Beable won't like hearing this.
} >>
} >>
} >> I believe you're wasting bandwidth.
} >>
} >I believe you said you were plonking me.  Make up your mind, Alexa.
} >Sheesh.  Or is your plonker b0rken again?
}
} I believe you're wasting bandwidth.

I believe you're parroting a long outdated concept which had
questionable application even when it was somewhat rational.

Due to the glut of fiber optics, the full usenet feed of 200+ GB per
day is about 20% of available capacity. Therefore, there is more than
ample bandwidth available, and in fact there's a 400% surplus. There
is so much surplus pipe under ground that several companies have gone
broke.

In addition, this message constitutes approximately one part in one
hundred million (single digit KB vs. 200 GB) of the current usenet
traffic flow. Saying this message is a waste of anything is like
saying the water that drips off of you as you exit the ocean and walk
onto the beach is wasted because it's not returned to the ocean.

When syadmins paid the phone company for hard wired lines to connect
their systems, then "bandwidth" was an issue. No longer.

If bandwidth is really a concern of yours, then stop using the phone.
That uses thousands of times more bandwidth per message than does text
on usenet.

smoochers.

Yes, Andrea.

 Still haven't learned to read headers, eh, Alexa? Not only are
you a whackjob but apparently you're stupid, too.

                                                  -Ugly Bob