Re: IMPORTANT NOTICE TO ALL DEBUNKERS AND TROLLS
Subject: Re: IMPORTANT NOTICE TO ALL DEBUNKERS AND TROLLS
From: Doktor DynaSoar
Date: 01/01/2004, 19:48
Newsgroups: alt.alien.visitors,alt.alien.research,alt.paranet.ufo,alt.paranet.abduct,alt.usenet.kooks,alt.religion.kibology,alt.fan.beable

On Thu, 01 Jan 2004 01:13:00 GMT, no name <oobie@doobie.com> wrote:

} On Wed, 31 Dec 2003 19:50:53 -0500, Doktor DynaSoar <targeting@OMCL.mil>
} wrote:
} 
} >On Wed, 31 Dec 2003 14:16:05 -0800, "Ugly Bob"
} ><ugly_bob42@hotmail.com> wrote:
} >
} >} 
} >} Proven liar "Alexa Cameron" <oobie@doobie.com> wrote in message
} >} news:pb26vvcb1h195ftpcocm8e7g6jvecsbnp8@4ax.com...
} >} > On Wed, 31 Dec 2003 11:59:11 -0500, Doktor DynaSoar <targeting@OMCL.mil>
} >} > wrote:
} >} >
} >} > >On Wed, 31 Dec 2003 04:59:21 GMT, no name <oobie@doobie.com> wrote:
} >} > >
} >} > >} On Tue, 30 Dec 2003 23:57:30 -0500, "Dick Hertz (Hey, who's Dick
} >} Hertz?)"
} >} > >} <me@example.com> wrote:
} >} > >}
} >} > >} >x-no-archive: yes
} >} > >} >
} >} > >} >Alexa "no name" Cameron has a brand new box of crayons:
} >} > >} >> On Tue, 30 Dec 2003 23:27:42 -0500, "Dick Hertz (Hey, who's Dick
} >} Hertz?)"
} >} > >} >> <me@example.com> wrote:
} >} > >} >>
} >} > >} >>
} >} > >} >>>x-no-archive: yes
} >} > >} >>>
} >} > >} >>>Doktor DynaSoar wrote:
} >} > >} >>>
} >} > >} >>>>On Tue, 30 Dec 2003 17:03:53 -0700, Phoenix <saddam@spiderhole.NOT>
} >} > >} >>>>wrote:
} >} > >} >>>>
} >} > >} >>>>} In article <g0c3vvg3cr6rambjo72vdpr41sjpn59td2@4ax.com>, Doktor
} >} DynaSoar <targeting@OMCL.mil> wrote:
} >} > >} >>>>}
} >} > >} >>>>} > On Tue, 30 Dec 2003 07:51:59 GMT, Sir Arthur C.B.E.
} >} Wholeflaffers
} >} > >} >>>>} > Å.S.Å. <nospam@newsranger.com> wrote:
} >} > >} >>>>} >
} >} > >} >>>>} > } IMPORTANT NOTICE TO ALL DEBUNKERS AND TROLLS:
} >} > >} >>>>} >
} >} > >} >>>>} > IMPOTENT NAUGHTIES FOR ALL TRUNKERS AND DEBOLLS:
} >} > >} >>>>} >
} >} > >} >>>>} > } As you must all know, your deadline has past and
} >} > >} >>>>} > } all debunkers and trolls can NO LONGER post on these groups.
} >} > >} >>>>} >
} >} > >} >>>>} > Wrong.
} >} > >} >>>>}
} >} > >} >>>>} You believe Art is fallible?
} >} > >} >>>>
} >} > >} >>>>I believe Fart is beable.
} >} > >} >>>>
} >} > >} >>>
} >} > >} >>>I believe Beable won't like hearing this.
} >} > >} >>
} >} > >} >>
} >} > >} >> I believe you're wasting bandwidth.
} >} > >} >>
} >} > >} >I believe you said you were plonking me.  Make up your mind, Alexa.
} >} > >} >Sheesh.  Or is your plonker b0rken again?
} >} > >}
} >} > >} I believe you're wasting bandwidth.
} >} > >
} >} > >I believe you're parroting a long outdated concept which had
} >} > >questionable application even when it was somewhat rational.
} >} > >
} >} > >Due to the glut of fiber optics, the full usenet feed of 200+ GB per
} >} > >day is about 20% of available capacity. Therefore, there is more than
} >} > >ample bandwidth available, and in fact there's a 400% surplus. There
} >} > >is so much surplus pipe under ground that several companies have gone
} >} > >broke.
} >} > >
} >} > >In addition, this message constitutes approximately one part in one
} >} > >hundred million (single digit KB vs. 200 GB) of the current usenet
} >} > >traffic flow. Saying this message is a waste of anything is like
} >} > >saying the water that drips off of you as you exit the ocean and walk
} >} > >onto the beach is wasted because it's not returned to the ocean.
} >} > >
} >} > >When syadmins paid the phone company for hard wired lines to connect
} >} > >their systems, then "bandwidth" was an issue. No longer.
} >} > >
} >} > >If bandwidth is really a concern of yours, then stop using the phone.
} >} > >That uses thousands of times more bandwidth per message than does text
} >} > >on usenet.
} >} > >
} >} > >smoochers.
} >} >
} >} > Yes, Andrea.
} >} 
} >}  Still haven't learned to read headers, eh, Alexa? Not only are
} >} you a whackjob but apparently you're stupid, too.
} >} 
} >}                                                   -Ugly Bob
} >} 
} >
} >Perhaps this is a good thing. Perhaps someone has helped me to
} >identify one of my other personalities. As far as I knew before, all
} >of my different personalities were exctly the same.
} >
} >Either that, or you're right.
} 
}  He's a child yammering on and on and on about this Alexa person.  

I'm still waiting to find out about who or what Andrea is.

} What an obsession!  It's getting to be hilarious.  I can't stop laughing --
} at Bob.

It's good to keep a sense of humor about things.