In article <ap5otv453f4knpfnt3qpbcj7p6j87q3eo7@4ax.com>, Doktor DynaSoar says...

On Sun, 14 Dec 2003 05:34:22 GMT, Th� Wh�l�l僃�r �����DR�M
<nospam@newsranger.com> wrote:

} ilk.

Why is it people use "ilk" only as a negative connotation, when the
fact is it's a neutral word meaning "kind" or "type"?

Why is it people use "ilk" at all on usenet? They never use it in real
life. Except for talkandtalkandtalkandtalkandtalkandtalk show hosts,
who are retarded to begin with.

I think people who use the word "ilk" are an ilk. Except for me.

} Of course we will give the debunkers a "grace period" that starts RIGHT NOW.  It
} would be much easier if the debunkers would voluntarily turn themselves in to
} your local authorities. 

I tried to turn myself into their local authorities, but I'm still
just me.

What am I doing wrong?

Try harder.  I will notify the authorities that you are going
to really turn youself in and supply a list of all truth-terrorists,
their supporters, their sympathizers, their friends, friends
of supporters, supporters of sympathizers, friends of supporters
of sympathizers and the rest.  

While you are at it, please denounce your previous
association with the Cult of Useful Idiots.
That may help,

Sir Arti�