On Fri, 02 Jan 2004 16:48:56 -0500, Doktor DynaSoar
<targeting@OMCL.mil> wrote:

On Fri, 02 Jan 2004 12:12:58 -0500, barbara@bookpro.com wrote:

} On Fri, 02 Jan 2004 11:44:16 -0500, Doktor DynaSoar
} <targeting@OMCL.mil> wrote:
} 
} >On Fri, 02 Jan 2004 08:25:37 -0500, barbara@bookpro.com wrote:
} >
} >} On Thu, 01 Jan 2004 20:23:32 -0500, Doktor DynaSoar
} >} <targeting@OMCL.mil> wrote:
} >} 
} >} >On Thu, 01 Jan 2004 16:20:29 -0500, barbara@bookpro.com wrote:
} >} >
} >} >} On Thu, 01 Jan 2004 15:10:16 -0500, Doktor DynaSoar
} >} >} <targeting@OMCL.mil> wrote:
} >} >} 
} >} >} >I certainly don't recall being Andrea Chen. And I definitely wasn't
} >} >} >trolling Ugly Bob. 
} >} >} >
} >} >} >But I must say, it's probably a waste of time to try to correct
} >} >} >someone who posts in all seriousness to usenet using phrases like "pee
} >} >} >pee brain". 
} >} >} 
} >} >} So true.  I recently posted to Usenet using the term "weeweehead," but
} >} >} it wasn't in very much seriousness at all.
} >} >
} >} >I should hope not. Presented seriously, it should be hyphenated:
} >} >"wee-wee". Similarly, double hyphenation represents the negation of
} >} >seriousness, i.e. "karl-malden-nose".
} >} 
} >} It's probably a waste of time to try to correct me.
} >
} >I'm not. I just happen to have an unfortunate mental disorder wherein
} >I have more answers than there are questions. 
} 
} And I have an addiction to one-liners.

Have you tried cutting down to only half-liners?

No, but I can, anytime I want.  I just don't want to yet.

BW