| Subject: Re: 2004 Update: Usenet UFO spOOk-KooK-Trolls List//How to Debunk Anything! |
| From: louminatti@myway.com (Lou Minatti) |
| Date: 03/01/2004, 04:09 |
| Newsgroups: alt.alien.visitors,alt.alien.research,alt.paranet.ufo,alt.paranet.abduct |
"hbosch" <hbosch@charter.net> wrote in message news:<vvbkh9ebv0c544@corp.supernews.com>...
Howdy Lou.
Hiya, Harry!
snip
If you stick around this NG you will be disappointed as
it is even worse than when you posted regularly.
Mostly there are a few of us "spOOks" and skeptics and
the rest are mostly below average intelligence. Well,
probably even lower than a 38 IQ.
It's very disappointing. Outside of Dr. Dick, who hasn't changed one
iota, I recognize none of the old-time UFO kooks. The "new breed" UFO
kooks appear to be just plain crazy, with low IQs to boot. At least
the Brian Zeiler's and Jean van Gemert's were capable of forming
coherent messages to back up their beliefs. UFOology has fallen on
some pretty hard times!
Perhaps the UFOologists who profit from the gullibility of the UFO
believers need to concoct some new scams. They used to come out with
new ones every year or two - crap circles, alien implants, "rods",
mysterious lights over Phoenix. The huxters have been silent for too
long. How many years has it been since the last "alien" scam? Can the
decline of UFOology be traced back to the departure of Art Bell?