Subject: Re: Dulce experiment
From: Michael Davis
Date: 03/01/2004, 13:49
Newsgroups: alt.alien.visitors,alt.alien.research,alt.paranet.ufo,alt.paranet.abduct,sci.astro,sci.skeptic

bjacoby@iwaynet.net wrote:
In sci.astro Michael Davis <mdavis19@ix.netcom.com> wrote:


Dulce is a hoax. Nothing ever happened at Dulce. There was no battle, no underground alien base, no nothing. Don't believe me? Then go look for yourself. It's not on some super-secret military base like Area 51. Archuletta Mesa is on public land and just off the highway. You can drive right up to the place. Guess what? There's nothing there. There's never been anything there. The whole story is just plain silly and only the passionately credulous could buy into it.


You can consider it brought on and totally debunked, kook.


As I understand it the "battle" was supposed to be deep underground. So pray tell just what does looking at the
dirt overhead "prove"?

So you think it's possible to build a huge underground base and have a massive battle without disturbing the ground at all? Where did all the excavated dirt and rock go? Where is the entrance(s) to this supposed base? Where is the evidence that any heavy construction ever took place there? Many versions of the Dulce myth allege the military fought alien saucers on the surface at the entrance to the underground base. There is no entrance or any evidence of a battle. And before you start shouting about government cover-ups, remember that this is public land just outside of a fair sized town, and not a secret military base where security could be enforced. Any strange government or military activity would have had to have been witnessed by lots of people. So why is it that only a former mental patient named Paul Bennewitz seems to know anything about it?

Face it, Dulce is a hoax.



Do try to get a grip on reality, boy.


Why is it that "debunkers" seem to only have name calling
as "proof".

The lack of any evidence of anything unusual at Dulce is all the "proof" I need to see that the Dulce myth is just so much horse shit. As for name calling, well Pietro *is* a kook. So it's not name calling when it is an accurate description of a person. HTH.

For defending the amazingly silly Dulce myth, you have earned the accurate description of "Credulous Woo-Woo." Congratulations.

--
The Evil Michael Davis(tm)
http://www.mdpub.com/scopeworks/
http://skepticult.org Member #264-70198-536
Member #33 1/3 of The "I Have Been Killfiled By Tommy" Club

"There's a sucker born every minute" - David Hannum (often erroneously attributed to P. T. Barnum)