| Subject: Re: Dulce experiment |
| From: Michael Davis |
| Date: 03/01/2004, 13:49 |
| Newsgroups: alt.alien.visitors,alt.alien.research,alt.paranet.ufo,alt.paranet.abduct,sci.astro,sci.skeptic |
bjacoby@iwaynet.net wrote:
In sci.astro Michael Davis <mdavis19@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
Dulce is a hoax. Nothing ever happened at Dulce. There was no
battle, no underground alien base, no nothing. Don't believe me?
Then go look for yourself. It's not on some super-secret military
base like Area 51. Archuletta Mesa is on public land and just off
the highway. You can drive right up to the place. Guess what?
There's nothing there. There's never been anything there. The
whole story is just plain silly and only the passionately
credulous could buy into it.
You can consider it brought on and totally debunked, kook.
As I understand it the "battle" was supposed to be deep
underground. So pray tell just what does looking at the
dirt overhead "prove"?
So you think it's possible to build a huge underground base and
have a massive battle without disturbing the ground at all? Where
did all the excavated dirt and rock go? Where is the entrance(s)
to this supposed base? Where is the evidence that any heavy
construction ever took place there? Many versions of the Dulce
myth allege the military fought alien saucers on the surface at
the entrance to the underground base. There is no entrance or any
evidence of a battle. And before you start shouting about
government cover-ups, remember that this is public land just
outside of a fair sized town, and not a secret military base where
security could be enforced. Any strange government or military
activity would have had to have been witnessed by lots of people.
So why is it that only a former mental patient named Paul
Bennewitz seems to know anything about it?
Face it, Dulce is a hoax.
Do try to get a grip on reality, boy.
Why is it that "debunkers" seem to only have name calling
as "proof".
The lack of any evidence of anything unusual at Dulce is all the
"proof" I need to see that the Dulce myth is just so much horse
shit. As for name calling, well Pietro
*is* a kook. So it's not
name calling when it is an accurate description of a person. HTH.
For defending the amazingly silly Dulce myth, you have earned the
accurate description of "Credulous Woo-Woo." Congratulations.
--
The Evil Michael Davis(tm)
http://www.mdpub.com/scopeworks/
http://skepticult.org Member #264-70198-536
Member #33 1/3 of The "I Have Been Killfiled By Tommy" Club
"There's a sucker born every minute" - David Hannum (often
erroneously attributed to P. T. Barnum)