<bjacoby@iwaynet.net> wrote in message news:bt7b8d$538$2@tribune.oar.net...

In sci.astro OhBrother <Nobody@noplace.com> wrote:

Why is it that "debunkers" seem to only have name calling
as "proof".

Bjacoby

Why is it that "true believers" seem to only have name calling instead

of

"proof"

Lookee here. "Anonymous OhBrother" who can't even come up with his/her
own real name barfs out more "proof"! I'm now a "true believer"
for pointing out the bogus nature of his/her so-called debunking
arguments!

Good lord!  You've been barfing out your credulous denials for months now,
so don't try to unleash this BS on me.  So far as your concerned, OhBrother
is all the name you need to deal with.  It is especially chosen for those
people such as your ilk for which "Oh Brother" is a reasonable explicative.

I know I'm convinced now!

For someone who starts out 'believing', I'd be willing to believe that last
comment.  Skepticism is not a flaw, it's a strength.

O'

Bjacoby

--
Due to SPAM innundation above address is turned off!