Subject: Re: Dulce experiment
From: "Carl R. Osterwald" <i@mac.com>
Date: 05/01/2004, 17:45
Newsgroups: alt.alien.visitors,alt.alien.research,alt.paranet.ufo,alt.paranet.abduct,sci.astro,sci.skeptic

In article <bt7dd0$6r7$2@tribune.oar.net>, <bjacoby@iwaynet.net> wrote:

In sci.astro Carl R. Osterwald <i@mac.com> wrote:
For defending the amazingly silly Dulce myth, you have earned the 
accurate description of "Credulous Woo-Woo." Congratulations.

Lies. Lies. All lies! :)

This is bjacoby, who thinks quantum mechanics is bunk while poasting
his 'theories' through all those silicon semiconductors.

I never said semiconductors didn't exist or don't "work" to make
devices. In fact, I even never said that quantum mechanics doesn't
(on average) give useful answers. [even though it promises a hell of
a lot more than you can actually calculate with it!] I only said that 
as an "ultimate" understanding of nature, it's very lacking.

Nice dodge and weave, but you said "QM needs to be debunked."  Get a
dictionary and some clues.


-=-=-=-=-