| Subject: Re: Dulce experiment |
| From: "Carl R. Osterwald" <i@mac.com> |
| Date: 05/01/2004, 17:45 |
| Newsgroups: alt.alien.visitors,alt.alien.research,alt.paranet.ufo,alt.paranet.abduct,sci.astro,sci.skeptic |
In article <bt7dd0$6r7$2@tribune.oar.net>, <bjacoby@iwaynet.net> wrote:
In sci.astro Carl R. Osterwald <i@mac.com> wrote:
For defending the amazingly silly Dulce myth, you have earned the
accurate description of "Credulous Woo-Woo." Congratulations.
Lies. Lies. All lies! :)
This is bjacoby, who thinks quantum mechanics is bunk while poasting
his 'theories' through all those silicon semiconductors.
I never said semiconductors didn't exist or don't "work" to make
devices. In fact, I even never said that quantum mechanics doesn't
(on average) give useful answers. [even though it promises a hell of
a lot more than you can actually calculate with it!] I only said that
as an "ultimate" understanding of nature, it's very lacking.
Nice dodge and weave, but you said "QM needs to be debunked." Get a
dictionary and some clues.
-=-=-=-=-