On Thu, 8 Jan 2004 02:36:35 -0000, "Cliff Smith"
<cliff(nospam)smith@ntlworld.com> wrote:

"no name" <noname@nospam.com> wrote in message
news:bnepvvc3lnhnkidcdtgctoe4mv4l8fqfkr@4ax.com...

On Thu, 8 Jan 2004 01:55:59 -0000, "Cliff Smith"
<cliff(nospam)smith@ntlworld.com> wrote:

"no name" <noname@nospam.com> wrote in message
news:mo8pvvs6gs7cj2fq4v3oduf0fg409q9nl9@4ax.com...

1.  Name one independent scientist not employed by or under contract by

NASA

who has been invited by NASA to scientifically peer review the raw Mars
data.

The body responsible is the General Accounting Office, which has high
credibility with most UFO believers, since it instigated an independant
review of the Roswell case.

http://www.nasawatch.com/peer.review.html

"All NASA research, including research resulting from unsolicited

proposals,

is subject to peer review, and peer review is conducted primarily to

award

funds on the basis of scientific merit."

Translation:  Awarded by NASA contract.  Dorry doesn't meet the criteria

for

independent sientific review.

Did you even look at the site I linked to? Almost all of NASA's research
results

Results?  How is NASA's researsh results equivalent in examining and peer
reviewing the RAW data?

It isn't.  So stop with the NASA double speak for which they're famous.

{snip}