| Subject: Re: The Failure of NASA: And A Way Out |
| From: DarkMatter |
| Date: 09/01/2004, 02:14 |
| Newsgroups: sci.astro,sci.skeptic,alt.alien.visitors,alt.alien.research,alt.paranet.ufo,alt.paranet.abduct,alt.paranormal |
On Sun, 04 Jan 2004 07:31:10 GMT, no name <oobie@doobie.com> Gave us:
On Sun, 04 Jan 2004 07:29:22 GMT, no name <oobie@doobie.com> wrote:
On Sun, 04 Jan 2004 07:29:30 GMT, DrPostman <Look@mysig.foremail> wrote:
On Sun, 04 Jan 2004 05:55:49 GMT, Sir Arthur C.B.E. Wholeflaffers
?.S.?. <nospam@newsranger.com> wrote:
The Failure of NASA: And A Way Out
Funny how you post this on a day of success.
http://makeashorterlink.com/?N28F323F6
Only scientific missions are allowed.
And NASA needs to allow independent peer review of all their data.
You think that they don't? Easy to believe, coming from Nobody with
Noname.
I have a laser disc from the first Mars lander data. That was just
consumer level "review".
You are clueless to think that a scientist would want to hide a
discovery.