| Subject: Re: Questions LOCKHEED/NASA Avoids and Refuses to Answer |
| From: "Woodsy" <woodsy@woodsy.com> |
| Date: 22/01/2004, 20:47 |
| Newsgroups: alt.alien.visitors,alt.alien.research,alt.paranet.ufo,sci-astro |
"none" <anon@nospam.com> wrote in message
news:aed010psubd7g3reuatuja2mh6rcsf0nu4@4ax.com...
1. Name one independent scientist not employed by or under contract by
NASA
who has been invited by NASA to scientifically peer review Malins' raw
Mars
photographic data.
2. Why if NASA is operating under the auspices of a
government agency and their data belongs to the United States government
is
Dr. Malin allowed to claim ownership of the raw Mars photographic data?
3. Why doesn't the space shuttle say "property of the US Government"?
4. Why does President Bush dictating to NASA what they can and can not
do.
Name the laws which give the President power over NASA.
5. Is NASA a government agency or a private agency?
6. If NASA is a private agency under the auspices of Lockheed, then given
George Bush senior is advisor to Carlyle Industries which own controlling
interest in Lockeed, how can NASA avoid being in conflict of interest
with the US government which is allegedly funding space missions.
7. Given the above, if NASA is now a privately independently owned
government agency, is going to Mars a special interest project?
Oh...and you're probably gonna' tell us that there is a saucer at Groom
Lake.
Woodsy