On Mon, 26 Jan 2004 21:30:33 +0000 (UTC), "Mr. 4X"
<random.rvmwki@birskm.invalid.com> wrote:

none <anon@nospam.com> wrote in message 
news:r04810h9vn50nsf8niqlb8qh741pg3h072@4ax.com:

plato_world@yahoo.com (Leonardo Been) wrote:

A respondent Criminal Mind describes the mask (pretense) of
"rationality" behind which he hides his actual intentions:

    To destroy truth and to deny observations.

Still continuing your sleazy innuendo, trying to imply that skeptics
are "criminal" without actually saying so (that would be libel!)
It is not criminal to disagree. 

There are notions that Skeptics do not believe, and the reason they do
not believe  is that those notions have *no reliable evidence* to
support them. The notions that Skeptics do believe have reliable
evidence to back them up. 

People can be deceived - frauds and hoaxes rely on that. 
Some people can even deceive themselves. 
Skeptics are trying to avoid deception in their search for truth. 

Skepticism is the only reliable defense against frauds and con artists
spinning lies, as those lies have no reliable evidence behind them. 
It is not criminal to request reliable evidence, nor is it criminal to
disagree when no evidence is shown. 

         (It is a mask of lies about himself and other Criminal
          Minds, which he also uses fiercely to deny others
          observing his actual intentions and activities towards
          people and towards mankind.)

Would you care to translate that babble into plain english? 

Aliens do not exist.

Any proof, Camoron?

It's Camaroon.

MT