| Subject: Re: Say no to Bush's reckless budget plan |
| From: M�RD����� r郃�l��l�hW �hT <nospam@newsranger.com> |
| Date: 02/02/2004, 03:37 |
| Newsgroups: alt.alien.visitors,alt.alien.research,alt.paranet.ufo,alt.paranet.abduct |
In article <bvjq0m$2neq$1@pencil.math.missouri.edu>, Larry Fletcher says...
GREEN PARTY OF THE UNITED STATES
http://www.gp.org
Friday, January 30, 2004
Contacts:
Nancy Allen, Media Coordinator, 207-326-4576, nallen@acadia.net
Scott McLarty, Media Coordinator, 202-518-5624, mclarty@greens.org
GREENS CALL FOR OPPOSITION TO BUSH'S RECKLESS BUDGET PROPOSAL
WASHINGTON, D.C. -- Green Party leaders issued sharp criticisms of
President Bush's budget proposal, condemning the proposed increase in
defense spending ($401.3 billion authorization for FY2004) and
reckless cuts in funding for the social safety net.
"Starving social programs while offering privatization schemes, such
as the Medicare bill passed in November, is a two-pronged strategy to
transfer public services and resources to corporate ownership," said
Ben Manski, Wisconsin Green and co-chair of the Green Party of the
United States. "Massive defense spending and budget deficits serve
the same purpose. We're seeing our government and all the benefits it
allocates subverted for the sake of corporate profits."
Greens are urging Americans to join them in demand for a different set
of budget priorities. A fair budget, say Greens, would:
-- ensure a more progressive tax system, offering relief to working
people, making the wealthy and corporations pay their fair share.
(Congress must not allow Mr. Bush's tax breaks for rich people to
become permanent.)
-- set the military budget at a level that meets the need to defend
U.S. borders and honors the pledge of benefits for veterans. (This
does not include aggressive military ventures such as the 'preemptive'
invasion of Iraq, the cost of which is currently spiraling beyond $99
billion. See 'Cost of War in Iraq' <http://www.costofwar.com/>)
-- invest in environmental, human services, and public education, and
maintain publicly owned Social Security.
-- save health care costs with a single-payer national health system.
(See Physicians for a National Health Program <http://www.pnhp.org>.)
-- close corporate loopholes, end publicly financed executive bonuses
and other corporate handouts, and aggressively target swindles such as
Enron, offshore accounts, and war profiteering by firms like
Halliburton.
"Greens don't only oppose corporate giveaways," said Marnie Glickman,
Oregon Green and co-chair of the national party. "We challenge the
status corporations enjoy as 'persons' according to a
misinterpretation of the 14th Amendment, which has allowed
corporations to escape public accountability and to dominate our
political system. When Democrats and Republicans design budgets, they
do so largely according to the demands of corporate lobbies."
"This is why both Bush and his Democratic challengers favor
astronomical defense increases, reject national health insurance,
resist measures to stem global climate change, and prefer to balance
budgets -- including the projected $477 billion deficit -- on the
backs of working Americans," Glickman added.
MORE INFORMATION
The Green Party of the United States
http://www.gp.org
1700 Connecticut Avenue NW, Suite 404
Washington, DC 20009.
202-319-7191, 866-41GREEN
Fax 202-319-7193
- END -